Best 3d printing stock
Top 3D Printing Stocks for Q4 2022
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
-
Best Value 3D Printing Stocks
-
Fastest Growing 3D Printing Stocks
-
3D Printing Stocks With the Best Performance
SSYS is top for value and performance and NNDM is top for growth
By
Noah Bolton
Full Bio
Noah has about a year of freelance writing experience. He's worked on his investing website dealing with topics such as the stock market and financial advice for beginners.
Learn about our editorial policies
Updated October 06, 2022
The 3D printing industry is made up of companies that provide products and services capable of manufacturing a range of products. 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, creates physical objects from digital designs. The printing process works by laying down thin layers of material in the form of liquid or powdered plastic, metal, or cement, and then fusing the layers together. Though still too slow for mass production, it is a revolutionary technology that has the potential to disrupt the manufacturing logistics and inventory management industries. The 3D printing industry is comprised of only a handful of companies, including players such as Proto Labs Inc., Faro Technologies Inc., and Desktop Metal Inc.
The industry is so young that it has no meaningful benchmark index. But the performance of these stocks can be compared to the broader market as represented by the Russell 1000 Index. These stocks have not performed well. Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS), the best performing 3D printing stock, has dramatically underperformed the Russell 1000, which has provided a total return of -12.5% over the past 12 months. This market performance number and all statistics in the tables below are as of Sept. 20, 2022.
Here are the top three 3D printing stocks with the best value, fastest sales growth, and the best performance.
These are the 3D printing stocks with the lowest 12-month trailing price-to-sales (P/S) ratio. For companies in early stages of development or industries suffering from major shocks, this metric can be substituted as a rough measure of a business's value. A business with higher sales could eventually produce more profit when it achieves (or returns to) profitability. The price-to-sales ratio shows how much you're paying for the stock for each dollar of sales generated.
Best Value 3D Printing Stocks | |||
---|---|---|---|
Price ($) | Market Cap ($B) | 12-Month Trailing P/S Ratio | |
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 15.49 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
3D Systems Corp. (DDD) | 9.00 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Proto Labs Inc. (PRLB) | 37.49 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
Source: YCharts
- Stratasys Ltd.: Stratasys offers 3D printing solutions, such as 3D printers, polymer materials, a software ecosystem, and related parts. It serves a variety of industries, including aerospace, automotive, consumer products, and healthcare. On Sept. 13, Stratasys completed the merger of its MakerBot subsidiary with Ultimaker, which offers platforms used to make 3-D printers. Ultimaker is backed by NPM Capital. The merged company will keep the Ultimaker name and focus on providing solutions, hardware, software and materials to the industry. NPM Capital will have majority ownership of the new company at 53.5%, and Stratasys will own 46.5%.
- 3D Systems Corp.: 3D Systems provides 3D printing solutions. The company offers a range of hardware, software, and materials designed for additive manufacturing. Its products and services are used in a variety of industries and sectors, including aerospace, automotive, semiconductor, healthcare, and more.
- Proto Labs Inc.: Proto Labs is an e-commerce-based company that provides digital manufacturing services. It offers 3D printing, injection molding, CNC machining, and sheet metal fabrication. On Aug. 5, Proto Labs announced financial results for Q2 2022, the three-month period ending on June 30, 2022. Net income fell more than 80% to $2.6 million from the prior-year quarter while revenue rose 3.1%.
These are the 3D printing stocks with the highest YOY sales growth for the most recent quarter. Rising sales can help investors identify companies that are able to grow revenue organically or through other means and find growing companies that have not yet reached profitability. In addition, accounting factors that may not reflect the overall strength of the business can significantly influence earnings per share. However, sales growth can also be potentially misleading about the strength of a business, because growing sales on money-losing businesses can be harmful if the company has no plan to reach profitability.
Fastest Growing 3D Printing Stocks | |||
---|---|---|---|
Price ($) | Market Cap ($B) | Revenue Growth (%) | |
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) | 2.45 | 0.6 | 1,270 |
Desktop Metal Inc. (DM) | 3.07 | 1.0 | 203.9 |
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 15.49 | 1.0 | 13.3 |
Source: YCharts
- Nano Dimension Ltd.: Nano Dimension is an Israel-based 3D printing company focused on developing equipment and software for 3D-printed electronics. It develops printers for multilayer printed circuit boards and nanotechnology-based inks. The company serves a range of industries, including consumer electronics, healthcare, aerospace, and automotive. On Sept. 1, Nano Dimension released Q2 2022 results. The company's net loss widened sharply to $40.0 million from a loss of $13.6 million in the same quarter a year earlier even as revenue soared more than 13-fold. The larger second-quarter loss was fueled partly by $10.9 million in non-cash adjustments for depreciation and amortization expenses, and share-based payments.
- Desktop Metal Inc.: Desktop Metal manufactures 3D printers and related equipment used to build complex parts from metal. It also offers 3D printing software. The company serves a range of industries, including automotive, consumer products, education, and heavy industry. On Aug. 08, the company reported Q2 2022 results. Desktop Metals' net loss increase nearly seven-fold to $297.3 million compared to the same quarter a year earlier even as revenue tripled.
- Stratasys Ltd.: See above for company description.
These are the 3D printing stocks that had the smallest declines in total return over the past 12 months out of the companies we looked at.
3D Printing Stocks With the Best Performance | |||
---|---|---|---|
Price ($) | Market Cap ($B) | 12-Month Trailing Total Return (%) | |
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 15.49 | 1.0 | -34.5 |
Proto Labs Inc. (PRLB) | 37.49 | 1.0 | -50.6 |
Materialise NV (MTLS) | 10.95 | 0.6 | -53.9 |
Russell 1000 | N/A | N/A | -12.5 |
Source: YCharts
- Stratasys Ltd.: See above for company description.
- Proto Labs Inc.: See above for company description.
- Materialise NV: Materialise is a Belgium-based provider of additive manufacturing software and 3D printing services. It serves a range of industries, including healthcare, aerospace, and automotive. On Sept. 7, Materialise completed its acquisition of Identity3D, which makes products that encrypt, distribute, and track digital parts as they move through supply-chains. The value of the deal was not specified in the announcement.
The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed herein are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Though we believe the information provided herein is reliable, we do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. The views and strategies described in our content may not be suitable for all investors. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, all comments, opinions, and analyses contained within our content are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment, or strategy.
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
YCharts. "Financial Data. "
Stratasys Ltd. "Stratasys Completes Merger of MakerBot with Ultimaker."
Proto Labs Inc. "Proto Labs Q2 2022 Earnings Release."
Nano Dimension Ltd. "Earnings Press Release for Q2 2022."
Desktop Metals Inc. " Desktop Metals Second Quarter 2022 Earnings."
Materialise NV. "Materialise Acquires Indenity3D."
5 3D Printing Stocks to Consider in 2022
Back in the early 2010s, stocks were booming for 3D printing -- also known as additive manufacturing, a computer-controlled process in which three-dimensional objects are made. But the boom was followed by a bust as many pure-play 3D printing companies didn't immediately deliver on lofty expectations.
Rumors of the manufacturing technology's demise are clearly premature. These days, 3D printing is a high-growth niche that is steadily reshaping the manufacturing and industrial sectors. Some estimates point to a doubling in annual revenue from additive manufacturing between 2022 and 2026. Even growth investor Cathie Wood has launched a fund focused on manufacturing tech, The 3D Printing ETF (NYSEMKT:PRNT), via her company ARK Invest.
Here's what you need to know about 3D printing and additive manufacturing stocks for 2022:
Image source: Getty Images.
Investing in 3D printing stocks
The manufacturing of products in all corners of the economy is being revolutionized by 3D printing, from healthcare equipment to metal fabrication to housing construction. It's invading so many sectors that tech giants such as Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK), and HP (NYSE:HPQ) have launched products aimed at 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Other engineering and software outfits such as Dassault Systemes (OTC:DASTY), ANSYS (NASDAQ:ANSS), and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) have also gotten involved in 3D printing technology.
Here are five key players to consider for 2022 that are a more focused bet on 3D printing:
Company | Market Cap | Description |
---|---|---|
Desktop Metal (NYSE:DM) | $1.3 billion | Recent IPO that focuses on metal fabrication technology. |
Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS) | $1.5 billion | One of the original 3D printing pioneers, with a wide array of printers and supporting design software. |
Xometry (NASDAQ:XMTR) | $1.9 billion | A manufacturing marketplace, including access to on-demand 3D printing services. |
3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) | $1.9 billion | Another original 3D printing pioneer and the largest pure-play stock on 3D printing technology. |
PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) | $11.7 billion | A manufacturing technology provider with a suite of software and related services for industrial businesses. |
1.
Desktop MetalThis company is a recent entry into the 3D printing space after going public via a SPAC at the end of 2020. The stock has been a terrible market underperformer since then, losing three-quarters of its value as of spring 2022. However, Desktop Metal could still be a promising investment for the long term.
As its name implies, Desktop Metal develops 3D printing hardware and accompanying design software for metal and carbon fiber parts. The company's smaller systems can handle prototyping and one-off parts, and larger printers are production grade-designed for manufacturing facilities. Desktop Metal serves companies operating in automotive, consumer goods, and heavy industrial equipment businesses.
Despite a tenuous start as a public company, Desktop Metal was actually increasing revenue at a torrid triple-digit pace in 2021. Gross profit margins are thin, and the company generated a steep net loss, but that should improve over time as the business scales its operation. Desktop Metal also has several hundred million dollars in cash and investments to fund its expansion. It used some of these funds to acquire additive manufacturing peer ExOne at the end of 2021.
2. Stratasys
Stratasys was part of the early 2010s 3D printing stock boom and bust, but its business has endured. Sales took a dip early in the COVID-19 pandemic but are rebounding as the Israel-based company picks up new manufacturing contracts.
Stratasys serves a diverse set of customers, including aerospace and automotive parts manufacturers, medical and dental companies, and makers of basic consumer products. In addition to a wide array of 3D printer models, Stratasys develops software to help users accelerate the time between design and final printing.
It isn't the highest-growth name on this list, but Stratasys is profitable (on a free cash flow basis) and has more than $500 million in cash and investments on its balance sheet, as well as no debt. Management thinks its payoff from years of research and development into additive manufacturing will accelerate in 2022.
3. Xometry
This is another newcomer to public markets. Xometry completed its initial public offering (IPO) over the summer of 2021, raising almost $350 million in cash in the process. As is often the case with new IPOs, the stock has underperformed since then. It has lost over half of its value from the time it started trading on public markets, but the business itself is rapidly growing.
Xometry is a marketplace for on-demand manufacturing of prototyping and mass production. It has a network of more than 5,000 suppliers that companies can call on to meet their fabrication needs. Among the suppliers on the Xometry platform are 3D printing companies, injection molding, and automated machining. The company reported having more than 28,000 active buyers utilizing its platform at the end of 2021.
Although it isn't profitable yet, Xometry's unique approach to the 3D printing and additive manufacturing industry is growing fast. Like other names on this list, it has a sizable war chest of cash and short-term investments that it can spend on research and marketing as it tries to attract more suppliers and buyers to its marketplace.
4. 3D Systems
3D Systems was another early player in the 3D printing industry, and while it suffered through the boom-and-bust period of the early 2010s, its business has held steady for much of the past decade. After a brief dip during the early days of the pandemic, 3D Systems is back in growth mode.
The company develops printers and design software for all sorts of materials and industries (medical device makers, dental labs, semiconductor designers, aerospace, and automotive manufacturers). It claims leadership among independent 3D printing companies (as measured by sales). As the 3D printing industry expands in the coming years, 3D Systems thinks it will be able to attract lots of new business with its extensive experience and global reach.
As an established tech outfit in the manufacturing sector, 3D Systems offers investors the prospect of more stable growth, along with profitability. It also has a large net cash position from which it can consolidate its lead in 3D printers and software technology.
5. PTC
By far the largest company on this list, PTC is a longtime technology partner of manufacturing and industrial enterprises. Fast approaching $2 billion in annualized sales and highly profitable, PTC has all the tools needed to digitally transform industrial businesses.
Besides 3D printing computer-aided design software (ANSYS is a peer and software partner that also operates in this space), PTC specializes in augmented reality, industrial IoT (Internet of Things), and product life-cycle management software. Most of its revenue is subscription-based (including its Creo software that enables 3D printing), making for a stable and steadily growing business model that generates ample cash flow. PTC puts spare cash to work developing new products for its partners and makes bolt-on acquisitions of other software companies that enhance its overall portfolio.
As a larger company, PTC won't be the fastest-growing stock in the additive manufacturing and 3D printing space. However, the company has established itself as a leader in industrial technology and should be a primary beneficiary as the production of manufactured goods gets more efficient.
The future of 3D printing
Manufacturing technology is making inroads throughout the global economy by reducing the cost of production and localizing and speeding up the time it takes to deliver customer orders. This is far from mere hype. Nevertheless, as is the case with all technology investments, progress won't go straight up. Expect twists and turns in these stocks as they develop new methods to design and make products.
If you decide to invest, do so in a measured way. Maintain a diversified portfolio, be wary of stocks benefiting from investor over-optimism, and always leave spare cash to invest more when there are inevitable dips. Given enough time -- years and decades -- investing in 3D printing could eventually provide a big payoff.
Related communication stocks topics
Investing in 5G Stocks
As the 5G technology rollout continues, these companies look like winners.
Investing in Top Telecommunications Stocks
Our world is increasingly interconnected, and these companies make it happen.
Investing in Communication Stocks
Communications has a broad definition. These companies are the leaders in the space.
Investing in Top Consumer Discretionary Stocks
When people have a little extra cash, they indulge in offerings from these companies.
Nicholas Rossolillo has positions in Autodesk and PTC. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Autodesk, HP, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends 3D Systems, ANSYS, Dassault Systemes, PTC, and Trimble Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
What is the most durable material for 3D printing?
3DPrintStory     3D printing process     What is the most durable material for 3D printing?
While the 3D printing process seems like a great alternative to traditional manufacturing methods, the parts produced can be fragile and unusable. As a rule, this is the result of using standard materials that are not designed for strength and durability. But there is a solution: use durable materials! Durable 3D printing materials can greatly enhance your options, as you can print parts and assemblies for small projects without fear of breakage.
In this article, we'll take a look at the three most durable types of 3D printing materials. However, before that, we will take a closer look at what strength means in terms of filament materials.
What is strength and how do we evaluate it?
The strength of a material can be measured and evaluated in different ways. In this article, we will mainly use tensile strength (stress before something breaks). We will list the tensile strength of each 3D printing material in pounds or pounds per square inch (PSI).
Despite the obvious number of pounds the material can support, there is still a margin of error depending on how the part was printed. We've compiled research from a variety of sources to make sure these three materials are the strongest.
You must also understand that the material itself is not the only factor that affects the strength of the finished product. The design itself, post-processing and the 3D printing process also affect the strength of the part.
Polycarbonate
Polycarbonate (PC) is considered by many manufacturers and reviewers to be the strongest 3D printing filament available. In particular, it is possible to achieve high strength of polycarbonate products by 3D printing with an all-metal hot end and a 3D printer in a case that is isolated from the influence of the external environment.
Some Numbers
Airwolf 3D has come to the conclusion after many filament tests that polycarbonate is the best choice of durable filaments for desktop 3D printers. They were able to hang up to 685 pounds on a polycarbonate printed hook and found that this material had a tensile strength of 9800 psi. In contrast, the same part printed in PLA could only support 285 pounds.
Using a similar test, MatterHackers studied the tear strength of this type of thread, as well as a number of other materials. They were able to hang an average of 409 pounds on the polycarbonate hook, while the PLA parts had a significantly lighter average weight of just 154 pounds.
Finally, renowned 3D printing YouTuber Thomas Sunladerer reviewed several polycarbonate materials and gave very positive feedback on the strength of the material.
3D printing with polycarbonate
It is worth noting that the quality of 3D printing with polycarbonate is not very good. Compared to other materials, protrusions and small details may not turn out as well as using the same PLA.
According to Rigid.Ink, polycarbonate is mostly sold in clear. This 3D printing material has excellent heat resistance as well as impact resistance. But note that you will have to print at high temperatures. As mentioned above, it is better to use an enclosed 3D printer and a solid metal hotend.
Pros of polycarbonate : extra strong, excellent thermal and impact resistance.
Cons of polycarbonate : does not cope well with protrusions and small details of a 3D model, requires a body and an all-metal hot end, a limited number of colors.
Nylon
Next on our list of durable 3D printing materials is nylon. This material is considered by many to be the most reliable for desktop 3D printers. Nylon is inferior in strength to polycarbonate, but still clearly stronger than other competitors such as PLA and ABS.
Some numbers
A hook printed with nylon (910) thread had a breaking strength of 7,000 psi, while the same ABS hook only had a strength of 4,700 psi, according to Airwolf 3D. Airwolf 3D also noted that the nylon filament-printed clip holds 485 pounds.
MatterHackers posted similar results and noticed that a hook printed with their NylonX material can hold an average of 364 pounds before it breaks. Rigid.Ink also reviewed some nylon threads and gave them a four out of five rating for strength and a five for durability. For comparison: the strength and durability of PLA is three conventional units.
Nylon 3D printing
Nylon is slightly easier to print than polycarbonate, but it's still not PLA. Nylon filament is quite hygroscopic, so it must be kept dry and requires a high printing temperature of 220-270°C. This material is prone to slight warpage, but is also resistant to impact, fatigue, and high temperature.
Nylon pros: impact resistance, fatigue resistance, heat resistance, easier to print than polycarbonate.
Nylon 9 cons0042 : hygroscopic, warping, very high hot end temperature required.
Composites
Finally, composite threads, although not essentially a single material, can be extremely strong. Composites are threads with certain additives that affect the properties of the material, including to increase strength. The names of these threads usually have the words "pro", "reinforced" (reinforced) or "infused" (infused), since they are usually a mixture of different materials.
For this reason, it is impossible to assess where the composite fibers are compared to the two previous materials. Some composites, such as Carbonyte, can compete with nylon threads for strength, while some composites are less durable.
It all depends on what the composite thread consists of. Durable is usually a high strength material such as nylon impregnated with another high strength material such as carbon fiber or glass.
Speaking of carbon fiber, this is also a very strong filament that is sometimes used for 3D printed bicycles. However, some composite fibers are stronger than many pure carbon fibers, so they are not in the top three, but deserve special mention as composite fibers.
Some numbers
We will use carbon fiber nylon and glass fiber nylon threads as examples. MatterHackers has determined that hooks printed on these materials can hold an average of 349and 268 pounds respectively.
Rigid.Ink gave the fiberglass nylon filament four out of five ratings for strength and five for durability. They also gave the carbon fiber nylon a five out of five rating for both strength and durability. In comparison, PLA and ABS were in the top three for strength.
3D printing with composites
Composites vary in the way they are 3D printed, but they are generally relatively similar to their base material. Durable composite fibers are usually made from nylon, so you'll have to print at fairly high temperatures. These threads are also quite expensive.
Advantages of composites : This is a combination of several materials to achieve the best possible properties, durable.
Cons of composites: Expensive, requires high 3D printing temperatures.
Selection of materials for 3D printing. Part 1.
Hello fellow printers!
In touch 3DMindex.
I am a frequent user of the portal 3DToday.ru , and every time I see another article called “another technological plastic” I get a slight shiver. Between 2019Until 2020, so many materials have been released that it will be very difficult for even an experienced user to figure out why and for what this or that material is needed.
In my article tetralogy, I decided to make a detailed review of the materials presented by various manufacturers, excluding those that do not deserve special attention. I will make my own rating, according to which I will recommend this or that material from key manufacturers for purchase, and I will tell you about the experience of using them on various 3D printers. The following material manufacturers were chosen by me: Filamentarno, REC, PrintProduct, BestFilament and FD Plast Raise N2 , VolgoBot A4 PRO version, and others.
I searched for information bit by bit from different sites, and seasoned them with a little touch of subjective opinion, and also tried to combine everything in my (several) articles.
Let's start:
In this article I will talk about the most famous materials from which everyone begins to get acquainted with the 3D industry. I’ll tell you what to expect and what to fear when working with this or that material, indirectly go through the print parameters, talk about the technical characteristics, application, touch on the economic component when working with a certain material, list some features and sum up my “TOP manufacturers” for production materials and printers( in the high price category ) when working with these materials.
#1 ABS
ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, ABS) impact resistant technical thermoplastic resin. In 3D printing is the most one of the most popular material.
Print options:
- Extrusion temperature - 210-245°C
- Table temperature - 90-120°C
- Intercoat Cohesion - Medium
- Table adhesion - medium
This is one of those materials that must be printed in a closed chamber. Fortunately, all modern manufacturers equip printers with a closed case (with the exception of Magnum 'a). In this regard, the printing becomes less toxic, and also (which is no less important) there is a better sintering of the layers (cohesion). For the better, I can note the company Volgobot , they developed an active thermostatic chamber in the PRO version on their printer. In other words, in addition to a heated table (up to 150°C), they have a heating element with a convection fan, thanks to which a single temperature is maintained throughout the entire print volume. According to the manufacturer, the temperature difference in the chamber varies by ± 2°C at 100°C. With this thermal chamber, new frontiers can be opened for use ABS plastic. For example, you can put a model with 100% infill on the entire print area, and their print area is about 297/210/200mm. How does Picaso behave when printing? So in terms of print quality ABS ’om ( as well as other materials), they are objectively the first in Russia in this parameter, but the issue of stable operation is acute for them. I know that they are very worried about this, and this is their key merit, but my friends and I who work with this printer have malfunctions, in general, the issue of malfunctions can be attributed to any technique, but once it happened like this that Picaso did not start working out of the box yet ( this happens sometimes in case of careless transportation, and applies to all manufacturers of 3D printers ), but fast ( like-nowhere ) and qualified ( especially ) technical support helped to solve this and not only problems, thanks to them for that. As for other manufacturers, some print “good”, and some “satisfactory”, the question is more about how much manufacturers sell their goods for, and which goods are worth their money and which are not.
Specifications:
- Melting point - 175-210°C
- Softening point - 100°C
- Operating temperature -40+80°C
- Hardness (Rockwell) - R105-R110
- Elongation at break - 6%
- Bending strength - 41 MPa
- Tensile strength - 22 MPa
- Tensile modulus - 1.6 GPa
- Flexural modulus - 2.1 GPa
- Density - 1.1 g/cm³
- Shrinkage in the manufacture of products - up to 0.8%
- Moisture absorption - 0.45%
Application:
This material is found everywhere in our lives. It is widely used in industry, large car parts (dashboards, radiator grilles), cases of large household appliances, sports equipment, plumbing products are made from it. In 3D printing, it was the first polymer used. Unfortunately, in this area it is not as easy to handle as we would like. Due to the specifics of the technology, it is difficult to make large objects from it due to shrinkage, detachment and delamination of the model occur. A closed print chamber partially solves this problem, in order to almost completely get rid of it, it is necessary to have a thermostatic chamber.
Pros:
- Good combination of strength and resilience makes it suitable for mechanical applications.
- A wide range of temperatures used allows the use of products from it for technical purposes.
- Ease of machining, combined with chemical smoothing of the surface with inexpensive solvents such as acetone, allows you to make decorative items or cases with a high surface quality.
Cons:
- Does not tolerate UV radiation well, turns yellow in sunlight, which limits the use of unpainted surfaces outdoors
- Does not like drafts when printing, which limits the use of cheap printers with an open case.
- Due to relatively high shrinkage, it is prone to delamination (separation), requires a heated bed, without it there are problems with the first layer sticking to the bed.
- An unpleasant odor may form during printing, it is better to print in a ventilated room, or equip the printer with a special exhaust ventilation system, with output outside the apartment.
Economic component:
Here is a table with manufacturers, with current prices for January 21. Since manufacturers sell coils in different weights, I decided to find the cost of the material per gram of the product by the ratio of price to weight. The result is presented in column “ ₽/M ”. The column “ Quality ” is absolutely subjective, because I gave points in it absolutely arbitrarily, based on the experience of working with material from one or another representative, but in general, the quality of the current mastodons of production is ± on the same level, and the problems that I have with printing can be associated with the storage conditions of materials. Column “ Recommendation ” - is the ratio of “ Quality ” to “ ₽/M ”, it is needed in order to reduce these values to a common denominator, the higher the score in it, the more I recommend the material from this manufacturer.
What is the result?
1st place - FD Plast (Recommended for test printing)
2nd place - Filamentarno (I highly recommend)
3rd place - PrintProduct
4th place - Bestfilament
5th place - REC
To my surprise, FD Plast has the first place in this championship, and REC is outsiders. What are the reasons? Of course in price. About 5 years ago, REC was the top quality with corresponding prices, but over the past couple of years, other manufacturers have pulled up in this parameter, but the prices are kept lower than REC, hence the connection. Maybe after this article, REC will stop slightly jacking up prices for their material, and will be more accessible to ordinary buyers.
As for FD Plast, in my opinion, their material is suitable for test or home printing, but if you have a serious large-scale project and tight deadlines, then it is better to contact trusted manufacturers. It will turn out more expensive, but spend less time and nerves in case the seal fails.
It is also worth noting that there are many brands and composites based on ABS, and therefore the prices for the material can vary so much, unfortunately, the manufacturer does not offer a technological map for the material, which is why it is impossible to fully find the answer to Question: Why is it so expensive?
If you order 3D printing from various companies, then on average in the provinces the price for printing with this plastic is from 10 to 30 rubles per gram, if you order from top3Dshop, then the price for ABS is 45 rubles per gram.
In general, the use of this plastic is quite profitable if you are going to fulfill orders for 3D printing.
Top ABS 3D Printer:
1 Place - Picaso
2 Place - Hercules (slightly not up to Picaso in quality, I think the price tag for equipment is too high, I took it myself solely from the recommendations of comrades and a large (high) print area. )
3rd place - Volgobot (the quality is comparable to Hercules strong, but the price tag is lower, I put it in 3rd place due to the fact that the company is not as large as direct competitors, although it has its own development vector, and their thermal chamber works wonders with ABS, however this is not their only worthy development, they have a configurator with a large list of options in which you can assemble a printer for your tasks, however, you should contact the manufacturer for all the details. but the guys try and keep in touch with all their customers.)
All other printers have approximately the same level of printing with ABS, since for 5-8 years of the existence of companies, all ± have learned to work with this material.
Worth mentioning: Ultimaker / Raise Pro 2 I am not satisfied, and the price tag is also not small)
#2 PLA
PLA plastic (polylactide, PLA) is a biodegradable thermoplastic aliphatic polyester, the structural unit of which is lactic acid. PLA is made from corn, sugar cane, potato or corn starch, and cellulose. It is one of the most popular materials for 3D printing. Due to its natural raw materials in the composition of the polymer, it can be used for various purposes without a threat to humans.
Print options:
- Extrusion temperature - 190-230°C
- Table temperature - 20-60°C
- Interlayer cohesion - good
- Table adhesion - good
- It is essential to dry the filament spool before use for more stable printing.
Specifications:
- Melting point - 175-180°C
- Softening point - 50°C
- Product operating temperature -20+40°C
- Hardness (Rockwell) - R70-R90
- Elongation at break - 3.8%
- Flexural strength - 55.3 MPa
- Tensile strength - 57.8 MPa
- Tensile modulus - 3.3 GPa
- Flexural modulus - 2.3 GPa
- Density - 1. 23-1.25 g/cm³
- Manufacturing shrinkage - no
- Moisture absorption - 0.2-0.4%
Application:
PLA-plastic shows itself excellently in mock-up workshops and in creating master models that are not designed to bear long-term mechanical loads. With it, models with careful detail are obtained, and are also used when working with children.
Pros:
- Does not shrink during printing, which allows you to get an exact match of the dimensions of the printed product to the simulated one.
- Does not require a heated bed and is not afraid of drafts when printing, which means it can be used for printing on the cheapest Chinese printer with an open case.
- Non-toxic. During printing, it smells pleasant and slightly, which allows you to print it in an apartment without using a special hood.
- Hard, durable and slippery, wide range of applications.
- Produced from natural ingredients, can be used in food contact.
- Biodegradable, this plastic does not harm the environment when disposed of.
Cons:
- Exposure to air and ultraviolet light, like any natural material, becomes more brittle over time, and therefore not recommended for long-term use under high physical exertion or use without a protective coating outdoors.
- Low softening point (50°C) - in the inside of a car left in the sun on a hot day, easily softens and loses its shape.
- Narrow temperature range (-20 to +40°C).
- The high hardness of the plastic makes it difficult to machine.
- Due to the high content of residual monomers, plastics from some manufacturers are prone to plugging in all-metal hot ends.
Economic component:
PLA prices are slightly higher, and therefore our TOP has shifted slightly:
1st place - Filamentarno (Recommended)
2 Place - FD Plast (Worth a try for a test print)
3rd place - PrintProduct
4th place - REC
5th place - BestFilament
PLA is a material that absorbs a lot of moisture, due to which its performance drops dramatically, and an already fragile material becomes almost glassy. FD Plast once again takes its price, bypassing its competitors by 1.5, or even almost 2 times, but I suffered a lot with it, it draws moisture from the air, probably as much as silica gel from shoes.
If you order 3D printing from various companies, then on average in the provinces the price for printing with this plastic is from 10 to 20 rubles per gram, if you order from top3Dshop, then the price for PLA is 35 rubles per gram.
Based on the issue of profit, the use of this plastic brings less money per 1 gram of material, but due to its features, there are much fewer problems in printing with this plastic than with the same ABS.
Top PLA 3D printers:
1st place - Picaso (In the past they had problems with printing these materials, the extruder often clogged, now as far as I know this problem has been fixed)
2nd place - All remaining manufacturers. (As of January 21, all manufacturers have learned to produce approximately the same print quality for PLA, in principle, this is one of the easiest materials to work with, and I don’t see much point in crucifying, put more airflow and print on health)
Worthy of mention: Raise PRO 2 (this is perhaps one of the worst printers for PLA printing, I tried to print on it in one CMIT, and from the stuffy room the extruders clogged literally on every print, in general, it also depends on the material manufacturer, but one and the same coil on different printers showed itself in completely different ways, and therefore I highly do not recommend printing with PLA plastic on this printer)
#3 PET-G
PETG (polyethylene tereflatate glycol, PETG) is a highly impact-resistant plastic that does not crystallize due to glycol modification, making deep drawing thermoforming more possible. At the moment, plastic is actively gaining popularity, all because it combines the positive qualities of many other polymers.
For some manufacturers you will not find such material as PET in the catalog, this is due to the fact that marketers probably decided to rename this material, and therefore Filamentarno has Prototyper as an analogue of PET, and RELAX for REC.
Print options:
- Extrusion temperature - 215-245°C
- Table temperature - 20-80°C
- Interlayer cohesion - very high
- Table Adhesion - Medium
Specifications:
- Extrusion temperature - 215-245°C
- Table temperature - 20-80°C
- Interlayer cohesion - very high
- Table Adhesion - Medium
- Specifications
- Melting point - 222-225°C
- Softening point - 80°C
- Operating temperature -40+70°C
- Hardness (Rockwell) - R106
- Elongation at break - 50%
- Flexural strength - 76. 1 MPa
- Tensile strength - 36.5 MPa
- Tensile modulus - 2.6 GPa
- Flexural Modulus - 1.12 GPa
- Density - 1.3 g/cm³
- Manufacturing shrinkage - no
- Moisture absorption - 0.12%
Application:
PET is commonly used to make plastic bottles; due to its chemical neutrality, it is used in the food industry. By itself, PET-G is similar to PET material. In 3D printing, it has proven itself as a versatile material that can be used both in technical parts bearing low loads and in prototyping.
Pros:
- Odorless Printing - Allows you to print at home without the need for an optional exhaust fan.
- No shrinkage ensures high dimensional accuracy of prints.
- Very strong sintering between layers - can print thin-walled products with high strength.
- UV resistant - printed models can be used outdoors.
- Wide operating temperature range.
- Printing does not require a closed chamber.
- Good slip and impact resistance - can print gears, bushings and other machine parts.
- Non-toxic, products intended for contact with food can be printed.
Cons:
- High fluidity requires careful adjustment of the retracts.
- High printing temperature quickly disables the fluoroplastic insert in the hot end and makes you think about switching to all-metal thermal barriers.
- Lower strength and softening point than ABS.
- A fairly versatile material, good print behavior but not outstanding performance.
Economic component:
1st place - FD Plast
2nd place - Filamentarno
3rd place - BestFilament
4th place - PrintProduct
5th place - REC
Surprisingly, the PET-G rating is, in my opinion, the most honest one. Due to the fact that PET is more stable in terms of storage and printing material, there was a large increase in points in the “Quality” column. REC is again an outsider, once again I repeat that this is due to the high cost of the material, and it hurts me to see this company at the end of the top.
If you order 3D printing from various companies, then on average in the provinces the price for printing with this plastic is from 15 to 35 rubles per gram, if you order from top3Dshop, then the price for PET-G is about 40 rubles per gram (I did not find the exact price ).
Based on the issue of profit, the use of this plastic brings less money per 1 gram of material, but due to its features, there are much fewer problems in using this plastic than with the same ABS.
Top 3D printers for PET-G:
NOT top by PLA)
#4 HIPS
HIPS (High Strength Polystyrene) is a fairly soft plastic designed to be used with ABS to support dual extruder 3D printing. This was facilitated by its following properties: the same extrusion temperature as ABS, low sintering with ABS, the presence of a solvent (D-Limonene), which dissolves HIPS and does not dissolve ABS. Some manufacturers do not have this material in their catalog, in fact, I do not see its widespread use at the present time, and therefore it is not a pity.
Print options:
- Extrusion temperature - 210-245°C
- Table temperature - 90-120°C
- Intercoat Cohesion - Medium
- Table Adhesion - Medium
Do not start work without drying the coil!
Specifications:
- Extrusion temperature - 210-245°C
- Table temperature - 90-120°C
- Intercoat Cohesion - Medium
- Table Adhesion - Medium
- Do not start work without drying the coil!
- Specifications:
- Melting point - 175-210°C
- Softening point - 97°C
- Operating temperature -40+70°C
- Hardness (Rockwell) - L79
- Elongation at break - 64%
- Bending strength - 37.6 MPa
- Tensile strength - 16. 4 MPa
- Tensile modulus - 0.93 GPa
- Flexural Modulus - 1.35 GPa
- Density - 1.05 g/cm³
- Manufacturing shrinkage - 0.4%
- Moisture absorption - 1%
Pros:
- Less shrinkage than ABS, making it suitable for precision printing.
- Lighter density than PLA, allowing for prints where lightness is required.
- Softness of the surface that guarantees ease of machining.
- A matte finish that gives a smooth effect to garments.
- Almost same softening point as ABS, making it suitable for outdoor use.
Cons:
- Like ABS, requires a heated platform and is prone to delamination, albeit to a lesser extent.
- Lower bending strength than ABS and, as a result, more brittle products.
- Poor UV resistance, which limits the use of products in sunlight.
- All this makes it possible to use this plastic for the production of furniture decor and interior decorations.
Application: once this material appeared it was used to print supports on 2 extruder printers, the supports themselves were dissolved in limonene. To date, this is no longer so relevant, due to the appearance of such material as PVA, the material itself is completely unnecessary today. The material itself is quite stable, although it requires careful drying.
Economic component:
1st place - FD Plast
2nd place - Bestfilament
3rd place - REC
As far as buying recommendations, it can be safely replaced with PVA, in general I consider HIPS already out of fashion, so I doubt that anyone spends it in large quantities.
Top HIPS 3D printers:
1 Place - Hercules / Volgobot
2nd place - Picaso (Picaso dropped to second place due to the fact that slippage occurs when printing with HIPS, it is quite possible that they got rid of this problem on new printers, but in 2019 it was like that)
No. 5 SBS
SBS (styrene butadiene styrene) is another relatively new player in the 3D printing plastics market. It is characterized by low toxicity and shrinkage, as well as high strength. Its main advantage is its transparency. Products printed with this plastic and treated with a solvent acquire the transparency of colored glass.
This material has different names for different manufacturers, for example, for BestFilament it is called WATSON, and for some manufacturers it is not presented at all.
Print options:
- Extrusion temperature - 220-240°C
- Table temperature - 70-90°C
- Interlayer cohesion - low
- Table Adhesion - Medium
Specifications:
- Melting point - 190-210°C
- Softening point - 76°C
- Operating temperature -80+65°C
- Hardness (Rockwell) - R118
- Elongation at break - 250%
- Bending strength - 36 MPa
- Tensile strength - 34 MPa
- Tensile modulus - 1. 35 GPa
- Flexural Modulus - 1.45 GPa
- Density - 1.01 g/cm³
- Shrinkage in the manufacture of products - 0.2
- Moisture absorption - 0.07%
Pros:
- Relatively low shrinkage, allowing printing in open case printers.
- High adhesion to the table.
- Potential for food contact.
- Impact resistant.
- Beautiful colors for creating unique decor items.
- Transparency after processing, can be used in luminaires.
- Wide operating temperature range, frost resistance.
- Easy post-processing by both chemical and mechanical methods.
Cons:
- Poor intercoat cohesion, requires large orifice nozzles or 100% coverage.
- Relatively high print temperature, similar to PETG.
- Applications: Most often used in decorative elements and creating custom lamps.
Economic component:
1 Place - FD Plast
2nd place - Filamentarno
3rd place - BestFilament
Top 3D printers for SBS:
1 seat - Picaso
2nd place - VolgoBot
3rd place - Hercules
Conclusion:
As for the article: it turned out to be shorter than I planned, this category of materials did not include materials such as Flex (various modifications), Nylon and other
4 4 PC At the time of the final editing of the article, I realized that not all printers are capable of printing with these materials, Flex’a needs special extruders capable of printing rubber-like materials, for a PC, the presence of a closed case does not mean success in work, and the material loves temperature very much. Therefore, if the article receives some response, I will talk about “engineering plastics”, composites created on their basis, and also talk about materials that are at the forefront of progress, so my dear reader, adequate criticism is welcome.As for material manufacturers, a few words about each:
FD Plast : wins in public domain although I don't agree with it because I think their policy of dumping the market is wrong, but the company has many followers who prefer goods from the “cheap and cheerful” category.
Filamentarno: for me personally is the best manufacturer with an adequate price, not a small list of products, and with a constant quality that has never let me down.
Print Product: before switching to Filamentary, he mainly used the products of this company, in the past the company had a colossal list of products, but in the last year they decided to change the vector of development, and relied on materials whose quality can be sufficiently ensured .