3D printed injection molds


How to Use 3D Printing for Injection Molding

The majority of plastic products in the world today are manufactured by injection molding. However, fabricating molds can be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. Fortunately, molds don’t always need to be machined out of metal—they can be 3D printed.

Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing provides a cost-effective alternative to machining aluminum molds. SLA 3D printed parts are fully solid and isotropic, and materials are available with a heat deflection temperature of up to 238°C @ 0.45 MPa, meaning that they can withstand the heat and pressure of the injection molding process.

Download our free white paper to learn how to create 3D printed injection molds.

Download the White Paper

Webinar

In this webinar, we'll show you how to use stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs, reduce lead times, and bring better products to market.  

Watch the Webinar Now

3D printed injection molds in an aluminum frame with the finished injection molded part.

With affordable desktop 3D printers, temperature resistant 3D printing materials, and injection molding machines, it is possible to create 3D printed injection molds in-house to produce functional prototypes and small, functional parts in production plastics. For low-volume production (approximately 10-1000 parts), 3D printed injection molds save time and money compared to expensive metal molds. They also enable a more agile manufacturing approach, allowing engineers and designers to prototype injection molds and test mold configurations or to easily modify molds and continue to iterate on their designs with low lead times and cost.

SLA 3D printing technology is a great choice for molding. It is characterized by a smooth surface finish and high precision that the mold will transfer to the final part and that also facilitates demolding. 3D prints produced by SLA are chemically bonded such that they are fully dense and isotropic, producing functional molds at a quality not possible with fused deposition modeling (FDM). Desktop and benchtop SLA printers, like those offered by Formlabs, simplify workflow as they are easy to implement, operate, and maintain.

Formlabs Rigid 10K Resin is an industrial-grade, highly glass-filled material that serves as an ideal molding material for a wide variety of geometries and injection molding process conditions. Rigid 10K Resin has an HDT of 218°C @ 0.45 MPa and a tensile modulus of 10,000 MPa, making it a strong, extremely stiff, and thermally stable molding material that will maintain its shape under pressure and temperature to produce accurate parts. 

Rigid 10K Resin is Formlabs' go-to material for printing sophisticated molds for injection molding, which we showcase with three case studies in our white paper. French industrial technical center IPC ran a research study and printed thousands of parts, contract manufacturer Multiplus uses it for low-volume production, and product development company Novus Applications has injected hundreds of intricately threaded caps with a single Rigid 10K Resin mold.

High Temp Resin is an alternative material that can be considered when clamping and injection pressures are not too high and Rigid 10K Resin cannot meet the required injection temperatures. High Temp Resin has a heat deflection temperature (HDT) of 238°C @ 0.45 MPa, the highest among Formlabs resins and one of the highest among resins on the market, allowing it to withstand high molding temperatures and minimize cooling time. Our white paper goes through a case study with Braskem, a petrochemical company that ran 1,500 injection cycles with one mold insert printed with High Temp Resin to produce mask straps. The company printed the insert and placed it inside a generic metallic mold integrated in the injection system. This is a powerful solution to produce medium series quickly. 

High Temp Resin, however, is quite brittle. In the case of more intricate shapes, it warps or cracks easily. For some models, reaching more than a dozen cycles can be challenging. To solve this challenge, French startup Holimaker turned to Grey Pro Resin. It has a lower thermal conductivity than High Temp Resin, which leads to a longer cooling time, but it is softer and can withstand hundreds of cycles. 

Download our free white paper for the detailed case studies and to learn how to create 3D printed molds in-house for injection molding.

Download the White Paper

Injection molding with 3D printed molds can be used for a wide variety of applications. Download our white paper for five real-life case studies to learn how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts:

  • IPC conducted a technical study on injection molding with 3D printed molds 
  • Multiplus uses Rigid 10K Resin 3D printed molds for low-volume production 
  • Novus Applications injection molded hundreds of threaded caps with a Rigid 10K Resin three-parts mold
  • Braskem fabricated 3000 mask straps in a week with a High Temp Resin mold insert
  • Holimaker produces 100s of technical parts with Grey Pro Resin and Rigid 10K Resin molds

Textures on the Rigid 10K Resin 3D printed injection mold and the final molded part.

An injection mold 3D printed with Formlabs High Temp Resin.

Based on internal testing and case studies with our customers, we suggest to choose the 3D printing resin based on the criteria from the table below. Three stars means the resin is highly effective, one star is less effective.

CriteriaHigh Temp ResinGrey Pro ResinRigid 10K Resin
High molding temperature★★★★★
Shorter cooling time★★★★★
High pressure★★★★★
Increase cycle number for complex geometries★★★★★

The complexity of the injection molding process is mostly driven by the complexity of the part and the mold structure. A broad range of thermoplastics can be injected with 3D printed molds such as PP, PE, TPE, TPU, POM, or PA. A low viscosity material will help reduce the pressure and extend the lifetime of the mold. Polypropylene and TPEs plastics are easy to process at a high amount of cycles. In contrast, more technical plastics like PA will allow a lower number of runs. The handling of a release agent helps to separate the part from the mold, in particular for flexible materials such as TPUs or TPEs. 

The type of injection press does not have a significant influence on the process. If you are new to injection molding and are looking into testing it with limited investment, using a benchtop injection molding machine such as the Holipress or the Galomb Model-B100 could be a good option. Automated small scale injection molding equipment such as the desktop machine Micromolder or the hydraulic machine Babyplast 10/12 are good alternatives for mass production of small parts.

White Paper

Download our white paper for guidelines for using 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time and see real-life case studies with Braskem, Holimaker, and Novus Applications.

Read the White Paper

We recommend respecting the rules of design for additive manufacturing as well as the general rules for injection mold design, such as including two or three degrees of draft angles, maintaining a uniform wall thickness across the part or rounding up the edges. Here are a few helpful advice from users and experts, specific to polymer printed molds:

To optimize dimensional accuracy:

  • Plan stock allowance on the mold to post-process and adjust sizes.
  • Print one set of mold to understand dimensional deviations and account for this in the CAD model of the mold.

To extend the lifetime of the mold:

  1. Open up the gate to reduce the pressure inside the cavity.

  2. When possible, design one side of the stack flat while the other side carries the design. This will lessen chances of blocks misalignment and risk of flashing.

  3. Include large air vents from the edge of the cavity to the edge of the mold to allow the air to escape. This yields a better flow into the mold, minimizes pressure and alleviates flashing in the gate area to decrease cycle time. 

  4. Avoid thin cross-sections: surface thickness less than 1-2 mm may deform with heat.

To optimize the print:

  1. Adjust the back of the mold to minimize material: reduce the cross section in areas that are not supporting the cavity. It will save costs in resin and diminish risks of print failure or warpage. 

  2. Add chamfer to help to remove the piece from the build platform.

  3. Add centering pins at the corners to align both prints. 

If you have more questions about the workflow, make make sure to check our article FAQ: Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds. For the complete process workflow and other best practices, download our white paper. 

3D printed injection mold can accommodate side actions.

Combining moldmaking with desktop 3D printing allows engineers and designers to expand the realm of materials they’re using and bring the capabilities of their 3D printer beyond rapid rototyping and into the realm of production.

Using 3D printed molds, dies, and patterns to supplement molding and casting processes tends to be both faster and less expensive than CNC milling, and easier than working with silicone molds.

Beyond injection molding, 3D printed molds can be used for the following molding and casting processes:

  • Thermoforming and vacuum forming
  • Silicone molding (also overmolding, insert molding)
  • Vulcanized rubber molding
  • Jewelry casting
  • Metal casting

Follow the links to download our white papers with the specific guidelines for each process.

White Paper

Interested in other applications of 3D printed molds? Download our white paper that also covers thermoforming and casting with elastomers.

Download the White Paper

White Paper

Download our white paper to see how to create complex molds with 3D printing fast and learn about tips and guidelines that you’ll want to follow when preparing your mold parts.

Download the White Paper

White Paper

Download this report for case studies featuring OXO, Tinta Crayons, and Dame Products that illustrate three different implementations of silicone molding for product design and manufacturing, including overmolding and insert molding.

Download the White Paper

3D printing low-run injection molds

This article discusses the use of 3D printing to print molds for low run injection molding. Design considerations, materials, molds configurations and a comparative case study are all included

Introduction

Injection molding is the most common method for mass producing plastic parts. It is ideal for producing rapidly very large numbers of identical parts with tight tolerances.

In the past, 3D printing was used in the design and manufacturing process to only create and verify prototypes that would be later injection molded. Nowadays, technology developments in printer accuracy, surface finish and materials allow 3D printers to also directly manufacture the molds.

This article discusses the benefits of using 3D printing for manufacturing low-run injection molds and gives advice on the possible mold configurations, the available 3D printing mold materials and the best design practices for creating 3D printed injection molds.

📍 Please note: Hubs does not manufacture 3D printed molds, but does manufacture custom injection molded parts

What is injection molding?

Injection molding is the process of creating a components by injecting under pressure melted material into a die. The material fills the hollow cavities of the mold and when it cools it solidifies, taking the form of the die. The die then opens, the solid part is ejected and the process repeats. Automating the this process can yield very high production rates. The materials commonly used in injection molding are thermoplastic polymers, but it is possible to mold certain thermosetting plastics.

The high initial setup costs associated with injection molding make this technology cost-effective only at high volumes. These costs can range between $10,000 and $100,000 and are associated mainly with the very high requirements in designing, engineering and manufacturing the injection molding dies. Because of this injection molding is typically only used to produce very high volumes of identical parts at a low cost. A typical run can involve the production of thousands or sometimes millions of components.

The term low-run injection molding typically applies to runs of 10 - 100 parts. Traditionally, such small runs were not financially feasible due to the very high costs associated with manufacturing the tooling (the injection molding dies).

An industrial injection molding die used for producing a large number of plastic parts

Why use 3D printing?

It is important to consider whether a mold is going to be used to make 20 or 20,000 parts. Historically molds needed to be CNC machined to a very high tolerance from metal (most commonly aluminium or steel). These materials provide good wear resistance to the repeated injection, opening and closing of the mold and the temperature gradients that they were exposed during the injection molding process. However, metal molds do require a initial large investments at the setup stage.

For low-run molding, wear resistance is no longer the most critical factor. Certain 3D printing technologies, such as Material Jetting and SLA, are able to produce parts to a high accuracy with excellent surface finish. When this is coupled with the modern temperature resistant 3D printing materials and the design freedom 3D printing enables, it means that 3D printed molds are now a viable option for manufacturing low-run injection molding dies. 3D printed molds also allow the quick verification of the mold design, mitigating the financial risk of investing in an expensive metal mold.

3D printed molds are best suited for:

Fast turnaround times (1-2 week opposed to 5-7 weeks).

Applications where production quantities are low (50 - 100 parts).

Mold designs where changes or iterations are probable.

Parts that are relatively small (less than 150 mm).

3D printed mold configurations

3D printed injection molds are produced in 2 standard configurations:

Mold inserts in aluminium frames: This is the most common 3D printed mold configuration and generally produces more accurate parts. The mold is 3D printed and then inserted into rigid aluminium frames which provide support against the pressure and heat of the injection molding nozzle. Aluminium frames also help preventing the mold from warping after repeated usage.

Stand alone molds: In this mold configuration the mold is fully 3D printed and a rigid aluminium support frame is not used. This way intricate cooling channels can be integrated in the mold, but molds manufactured using this approach require more 3D printing material (increasing the print cost and time) and are more prone to warping after extensive use.

A 3D printed injection mold inserted into an aluminium support frame

(image courtesy of Formlabs)

Materials

A 3D printing material is suitable for creating injection mold if it has:

  • High temperature resistance - A high heat deflection temperature is required to withstand the mechanical and thermal loads applied to the mold during material injection. Note though that the temperature decreases rapidly during solidification.
  • High stiffness/toughness - Repetitively removing parts can cause wear to the mold, so materials with high stiffness are required to maintain mold accuracy over time.
  • High level of detail - One of the main requirements of an injection mold is high dimensional accuracy and a smooth surface. Highly accurate molds will produce highly accurate parts.

The 3D printing technologies that cover best these requirements are SLA and Material Jetting. These technologies can produce parts with high dimensional accuracy and are ideal for prints intricate details and very fine features. Speciality materials that are available in these technologies, like Formlabs High Temperature resin or Stratasys Digital ABS, are ideal for molding and tooling applications. An outline of the properties that are most relevant to injection molding for these two materials is shown below.

For industrial applications, desktop SLA is not suitable. An in-depth article comparing the two most commonly used industrial 3D printing materials for mold manufacturing (Digtal ABS and Somos PerFORM) can be found here.

Property Formlabs High Temp resin* Stratasys Digital ABS**
Heat deflection temperature 289 ℃ @ 0.45 MPa 92 - 95 ℃ @ 0.45 MPa
Flexural modulus 3. 3 GPa 1.7 - 2.2 GPa
Impact strength (Notched IZOD) 14 J/m 65 - 80 J/m
Lowest layer height (resolution) 25 - 50 microns 16 - 30 microns
Minimum detail size 0.2 mm 0.2 mm
*Information sourced from Formlabs **Information sourced from Stratasys A 3D printed injection mold made from Digital ABS

Mold Design

Describing specific technical design of mold features (such as gates, runners, air vents etc) is out of the scope of this article. An internet search will reveal a large amount of information on the subject. This post by Seattle Robotics is a good starting point for those new to injection mold design.

Here is a list of some good practices that should be followed when designing a 3D printed mold:

  • When designing the mold for SLA printing, ensure that the inner faces of the mold are orientated so that no support is in contact with them. This will improve their surface quallity, as no support marks will present on these surfaces, minimizing the required post processing.
  • Including shallow air vents (0.05 mm deep) from the edge of the cavity to the edge of the mold will help expel trapped air during the molding process.
  • If the 3D printed mold is to be used for more than 20 runs, consider including channels in the design for embedding metal rods or tubes. These can help reinforce the mold, reduce warpage and improve cooling times.
  • 3D printing the mold at a lower layer height can help produce smoother molded parts as the molds will have less visible print lines.
  • Embossed and engraved details should be offset from the surface by at least 1 mm.

Specific restrictions on design will depend upon the injection molding machine that is used. However Stratasys suggest that molds made via their Material Jetting printers should be used to produce parts with maximum volume of 165 cm3 in 50 to 80 ton molding machines or manual hand presses.

Designing parts for injection molding

As with conventional injection molds, a designer should consider:

  • Adding a draft angle of minimum 2o degrees to aid in the removal of the part from the mold.
  • Maintaining a uniform wall thickness across the entire part.
  • Keeping all walls and features as thin as possible.
  • Including radii on all edges and corners.
  • Including thin ribs and gussets to add strength to a part rather than increasing wall thickness.
Draft angle design for injection molding

Learn more about the importance of draft angles in this article →

Reducing Flash

Flash is the name given to the material that comes out between the two halves of the mold during the injection process. This generally occurs when the two mold halves do not mate perfectly together, are not perfectly flush and flat or the mold is overfilled. Runners are used in the mold design to help reduce the likelihood of flash.

If designing for an aluminium frame, add 0.125mm of extra thickness to the back of the mold plates to account for the compression forces and to ensure a complete seal. Increasing the clamping force in the vise can also help mitigate flash, as can polishing the molds' split plane to give it as flat a surface as possible.

Good mold design and a flat mold face reduce the likelihood of flash occuring

(image courtesy of Formlabs)

Release compound

Due to the relatively fragile nature of the materials used in 3D printed injection molds compared to traditional molds, applying excessive force to remove a part from the mold can lead to rapid mold deterioration. Including a release compound on the surfaces of the mold cavity before the injection stage can assist greatly with part removal.

Case study: a plastic motor fitting

This case study will compare manufacturing a custom plastic fitting for a motor housing. The requirements of the design are:

  • The total number parts is 25.
  • A high level of dimensional accuracy in needed to ensure a tight fit.
  • The weight of the part is 0.005 kg (5 grams).
  • The part must be made from ABS.
  • The part must be black in colour.
  • The overall diameter of the part is 40 mm.

Here are the available alternative manufacturing options:

Industrial FDM ABS 3D printing: Industrial FDM 3D printing has high repeatability and can produces parts with high dimensional accuracy and is able to print parts in small to medium batches. The cost of the ABS filament used in industrial FDM systems is typically around $90 - $110 per kg. The main restriction for any part produced via FDM 3D printing is its anisotropic mechanical performance: parts are significantly weaker in one direction. This means that a designer must have a good grasp on the loads the part will be subjected to and the orientation of the model in the print platform.

Injection molding ABS parts with SLA 3D printed molds: High Temperature SLA resins are able to produce functional injection molds with a high level of accuracy that are best suited for low level production runs. SLA resins retail at around $150 - $170 per litre. A benchtop injection molding machine has been used for the calculations in this example with the 3D printed molds inserted into aluminium support frames. ABS pellets are used for molding the part that cost approximately $2 - $3

Traditional injection molded ABS part: Traditional injection molded parts have a very high level of accuracy, excellent surface finish and a very high level of repeatability. The main downsides of traditional injection molding is the high initial setup cost and the number of design restrictions enforced in the designing of the molded part (draft angles, constant wall thickness etc). The cost of the ABS pellets is the same as above.

A summary of the cost (based on online quotes) of manufacturing the ABS fitting using the technologies discussed above is summarised in the table below. All prices do not include shipping.

Industrial FDM* 3DP IM** Traditional IM***
Cost of mold N/A $70. 85 $1660.72
Cost per part $3.69 $0.05 $1.89
Total cost $92.25 $72.10 $1711.48
Lead time 4 days 2 days 8 days
* Quote sourced from Hubs.com with ABS, 20% infill printed on a Fortus 250MC ** Quote sourced from Hubs.com with Formlabs High Temp resin printed on a Form2 *** Quote sourced from Protolabs

Next steps: How to produce parts with injection molding

Is low-run injection molding with 3D printed molds the best solution for your application? Then there are two ways for you to move forwards with you project:

If you have access to an injection molding machine and the know-how to design the mold, then 3D printing the mold in a heat resistant material is an option. An article discussing the advatages and disadvatages of the two most commonly used 3D printing materials for manufacturing low-run injection molds can be found here.

Otherwise, you can outsource the production to a professional injection molding manufacturer. Hubs offers access to a global network of Injection Molding service providers, who are able design a mold for your part and produce volumes from 100 to 10,000+ units.

Need advice on your injection molding project?

Speak with an expert

Rules of Thumb

  • 3D printing the injection molds is the most cost effective way for low-run injection molding.
  • Material Jetting and SLA are the most suited technologies for 3D printing injection molds.
  • Use wide draft angles (2o degrees or more) and a release compound to increase the lifetime of the molds.
  • Keep the part volume lower than 165 cm3
  • Each 3D printed mold can be used for approximately 30 - 100 runs (depending on the material being injection molded).

Ready to transform your CAD file into a custom part? Upload your designs for a free, instant quote.

Get an instant quote

Injection molding from 3D printed molds

Study of low-volume production of small plastic parts

BRIEF INFORMATION

Form 2 printer and injection using a Galcom Model-B100 injection molding machine. Two transparent resin molds were tested: one large butterfly mold and one mold with four small butterflies in one block. A third mold for the USB stick case was tested in high temperature polymer. These molds were 3D printed by Formlabs and the castings were made by Galomb Inc and Formlabs in a variety of materials.

Formlabs and Galomb, Inc.

LOW-VOLUME 3D PRINTED PARTS PRODUCTION

Most of the plastic products in the world today are made by injection molding. Using inexpensive desktop 3D printers and injection molding machines, molds can be created to produce small functional parts from manufacturing plastics.

For low volume production (approximately 10-100 parts), 3D printed molds save time and money. They also allow for a more flexible approach to manufacturing, giving engineers and designers the ability to easily modify molds and continue iterating their designs at low time and cost.

The Form 2 Stereolithographic 3D Printer (SLA) produces completely solid, smooth parts that can withstand the temperature and pressure of desktop injection molding. 3D prints produced using SLA are chemically bonded so that they are completely dense and isotropic, producing functional shapes with a quality not possible with FDM.

Formlabs is partnering with Galomb Inc., a manufacturer of low cost injection molding machines, to test and demonstrate the viability of SLA injection mold printing.

Fig. 2 : 3D printed molds in aluminum frames.

METHOD

Both clear and high temperature resins can be used to print small functional forms, with high temperature resins offering compatibility with a wider temperature range of

thermoplastic melts. Formlabs Clear Resin was chosen for its strength, high detail and smooth surface Clear Resin is preferred for its transparency as you can easily see when forms are being filled, but any of the standard Formlabs Resins (clear, white, black and grey) can also be used as they have similar mechanical properties. The plates were printed with a layer height of 100 µm and took approximately 5 hours per plate. Depending on the geometry, multiple shapes can be printed at once on the build platform to improve printing efficiency.

Fig. 3 : Printing setup in PreForm with cavities up.

Two forms were printed from transparent resin. Parts and subsequent molds were designed to match Galomb machine vise sizes, 1 in3 injection cylinder capacity, and Form 2 build volume. supports were polished.

The parts were then cured for one hour under a 405 nm UV lamp to achieve full mechanical strength and rigidity. For a better understanding of the impact of post-curing on parts, see the Formlabs UV post-curing booklet.

Fig. 4 : 3D printed molds in aluminum frames and die-cast parts.

The first was a large Formlabs butterfly logo and the second was four small Formlabs butterfly logos. Both molds had a cavity, narrow inlets, and sprue at the point of injection and were designed in Solidworks. The molds were inserted into aluminum frames to provide protection from the downward pressure and heating of the injection nozzle. Aluminum frames can also prevent the shape from deforming after repeated use. The frames shown in figures 2 and 4 were custom made by Whittaker Engineering in Scotland, but standard aluminum frames are readily available on request from injection molding machine manufacturers.

Plastic pellets can be purchased online or from suppliers such as IASCO-TESCO. To create different colors, the molten plastic was pre-mixed with powdered dyes prior to injection.

Using a Model-B100 benchtop injection molding machine, Galomb tested printing plates with 25 shots of LDPE. LDPE melts at approximately 325°F (163°C) and was chosen for its low melting point. Of note, Formlabs Clear Resin has an HDT at 0.45 MPa 73.1 ºC after post-cure (see Material Data Sheet). HDT is a measure of the thermal properties of a material, but does not rule it out for use, although LDPE has a higher melt temperature. Whether your 3D printed mold will withstand the injection molding process depends on the melt temperature of the injection material, part geometry, and cooling and cycle times.

RESULTS FOR CLEAR POLYMER

After 25 injections of LDPE, there was no noticeable deterioration in the surface of the molds (chips, cracks or scratches). LDPE is not prone to sticking to polymer molds when tested, but other plastics may require the use of a mold remover to assist in part removal. Adhesion of the part to the mold can cause mold wear during ejection. Release agent is widely available, and silicone release agent is compatible with Formlabs standard and high temperature resins.

The cycle time for each injection was approximately three minutes. This process was accelerated by using compressed air to cool the mold. Cyclic injection into forms printed on the Form 2 causes the form to heat up. To counteract this, the cooling time between open mold cycles must be increased. While the mold cannot deform, too much residual heat will reduce molding success if the mold is opened too early. Galomb also improved molding success by etching shallow (0.05 mm deep) vent holes (not shown) leading from cavity edge to mold edge so that air does not enter the cavity during injection.

Some of the injections showed a leak in the parting line due to deformation of the polymer mold during the cooling phase after several injections. Increasing the clamping force in the vise can help mitigate leakage, as can polishing the parting plane of the mold to make it as flat as possible. Galomb proposed incorporating channels into the mold design to include metal tubes and fill them with aluminum epoxy, as a strategy to strengthen the mold, reduce warping, and improve cooling time.

Fig. 5 : A range of injection molding parts made using 3D printed molds.

FURTHER TESTING WITH HIGH TEMPERATURE POLYMER

Clear resin molds have been successfully tested using LDPE, which has a relatively low melt temperature. Higher melt temperatures can cause thermal shock in clear resin printed parts, which manifests itself as a deformed mold surface.

Transparent resin molds experience thermal shock when exposed to higher temperature molten plastic.

Formlabs printed the shape of a USB device case in High Temp Resin to test

Melting Point Plastics High Temp Polymer (HDT at 0.45 MPa = 289° C) Clear Resin (HDT at 0.45 MPa = 73.1°C)
LDPE 163 °C
PP 177 °C
TPE 177 °C
PLA 180 °C
ABS 204 °C
HDPE 204 °C
EVA 204 °C
Polystyrene 226 °C

High temperature polymer molds showed no temperature degradation at the mold surface for any of the tested plastics.

*DURABLE RESIN polymer is under development and final specifications are subject to change.

High Temp and Standard are the polymers best suited for molding. Of the Formlabs resins, High Temp has the highest HDT at 0.45 MPa and low thermal expansion. It is also the stiffest material with the highest stretch factor.

The relatively high stiffness of High Temp Resin means that the mold will not deform when the part is removed. This makes the use of a release agent especially important for removing parts molded from rigid plastics such as polystyrene.

GENERAL TROUBLESHOOTING

Form overflow leak.

Leakage occurs when the injected plastic is forced out between the two mold halves. This can happen when the shape is overflowing, or if the split plane is not completely flat. Adding thin exit ports to the mold can help mitigate leakage from overpressure within the mold, facilitate part removal, and eliminate entrapped air that can cause bubbles in the molded part. Although not shown, the plates were tested without the aluminum frame. The downside to this approach is that these parts use more material, which increases printing cost and time, and the forms can be more prone to warping. With this method, a steel washer placed between the printing plate and the nozzle of the injection molding machine protects the print from direct contact and helps distribute forces. In addition, pre-sealing the injection molding cylinder against a metal block helps ensure there are no air pockets to disrupt the plastic flow.

Printed lines visible on some parts; this can be reduced by printing the form with a lower layer height. The plates used in this study were printed at 100 µm, but 50 or 25 µm could also be used. This will improve the cleanliness of the plate surface, but increase print time and reduce tank life.

Final USB device case molded from high temperature resin.

DESIGN INSTRUCTIONS.

When designing a form, consider what will print successfully and what will form successfully.

  • Adding one to three degrees of recess on surfaces perpendicular to the direction of the recess will allow easier part removal and minimize mold degradation. Fillets should be applied to the inside edges to reduce buckling from internal plastic stress and facilitate removal of the part.
  • Embossed and engraved parts must be offset from the surface by at least 1 mm.
  • If you plan on using an aluminum frame, The surfaces of the split planes can be polished with fine sandpaper to reduce flare. add an extra 12mm thick plate to the back of the mold plate to account for compressive forces and ensure complete sealing.
  • Be sure to orient the mold halves in the PreForm so that the cavity is facing up. This will prevent reference marks inside the cavity and make post-print processing easier.

90° angle

2° recess

Optimum condition 2° recess and rounding.

PROCESS SUMMARY

STEP 1:

Part design in CAD.

STEP 2

Mold design in CAD.

STEP 3

3D print the forms on Form 2.

STEP 4

Remove support material from molds.

STEP 5

Insert the plastic into the mould.

STEP 6

Remove the part from the mold.

3D Printing Applications: Injection Molding

Skip to Main Content

Accelerate product development, reduce cost and lead time, and bring better products to market using 3D printing and low volume injection molding in your production process.

Read white paperRequest a sample

Use 3D printed injection molds on desktop and industrial machines to efficiently and cost-effectively produce hundreds to thousands of functional prototypes, as well as prototyping or final models.

Molds created with Formlabs 3D printers have been validated for use on desktop and industrial molding machines with varying pressures, temperatures and materials.

View the molding conditions customers have used

A complete desktop ecosystem

You can easily start 3D printing injection molds yourself with a Formlabs 3D printer and desktop molding machine. Quickly test, validate and reproduce prototypes, create pre-production models from material that will be used in production, and produce small series of final models without the need for a lot of equipment and training.

A complete, easy-to-use Formlabs ecosystem can be integrated into any injection molding workflow. Save time and money on low-volume injection molding projects by taking advantage of 3D printing to quickly and cost-effectively produce hundreds to thousands of models from common thermoplastic material.

Read the Quick Start Guide

Step 1

Mold Design

Use conventional manufacturing design techniques to create 3D printed molds.

Stage 2

Printing molds on the

Form 3 3D printer uses high performance materials such as Rigid 10K Resin to produce durable, smooth and detailed models.

Stage 3

Assembling the mold

Assembling 3D printed molds using a mold block increases their durability.

Stage 4

Mold closure

3D printed molds can be used on desktop and industrial molding machines.

Stage 5

Injection Molding

Molds created with Formlabs 3D printers have been validated for use in a variety of process conditions.

Stage 6

Cooling

The cooling process, which usually takes a long time for plastic molds, can be accelerated using compressed air.

Step 7

Removing the model from the mold

You can add ejector pins to automate the process of removing the model from the mold.

Formlabs' ecosystem of affordable 3D printers and high-performance materials produces durable, smooth, detailed injection molds that can produce hundreds to thousands of models in difficult casting conditions.

The

Form 3 High-Performance Stereolithographic 3D Printer creates molds with very high surface quality and detail, allowing you to meet all design requirements in their manufacture, as well as virtually eliminating the need for post-processing.


Learn more