Protocol 3d printer pen


The 2 Best 3D Pens of 2023

We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more›

  1. Games & Hobbies
Photo: Signe Brewster

If you like crafting—or perhaps you’re in a profession like architecture that often requires you to create 3D models—a 3D pen can be a fun and useful tool for “drawing” three-dimensional objects. After 35 hours of research, and having created 20 sculptures out of heated plastic with 10 3D pens, we’re certain that the 3Doodler Create+ offers the best overall experience. It has an easy-to-use, comfortable design and offers a hard-to-find set of tips for drawing different line sizes. Just as important, 3Doodler’s customer service is responsive and helpful, which is an essential feature for a relatively new type of product.

Our pick

3Doodler Create+

Comfortable to hold and easy to start using right away, the Create+ also benefits from 3Doodler’s excellent customer service and the option to buy different-size tips.

The models we made with the 3Doodler Create+ looked similar to those designed with other pens, but the Create+ provides the best combination of comfort, price, and customization of any pen we tried. It rests in your hand much like a normal pen, requiring only a brief button press to start drawing (some models require you to hold a button down while you draw). Without much practice you can draw a simple 3D box, or pick from hundreds of stencils to create designs like flowers and masks. However, you have to use 3Doodler’s own filament, which is more expensive than generic brand filaments that work with other pens—though it still costs only about a dollar to draw over 300 inches, or about $2 for an hour of normal drawing (including expected stops).

Advertisement

Also great

3Doodler Start

Though slow and lacking in features compared with traditional 3D pens, the Start is cool to the touch, making it safer for kids younger than 12.

The 3Doodler Start is slower and has far fewer features than most of the pens we tested, but both its tip and just-extruded plastic are completely safe to touch. That’s essential for kids under 12, who have a tendency to touch and mold plastic as a part of the creation process. The Start’s smaller, contoured shape also makes it easier for kids to hold.

Everything we recommend

Our pick

3Doodler Create+

Comfortable to hold and easy to start using right away, the Create+ also benefits from 3Doodler’s excellent customer service and the option to buy different-size tips.

Also great

3Doodler Start

Though slow and lacking in features compared with traditional 3D pens, the Start is cool to the touch, making it safer for kids younger than 12.

The research

  • Why you should trust us
  • What is a 3D pen?
  • How we picked
  • How we tested
  • The best 3D pen: 3Doodler Create+
  • Flaws but not dealbreakers
  • The best pen for kids under 12: 3Doodler Start
  • The competition

Why you should trust us

Since 2013, I’ve been discovering, studying, and testing 3D printers—and sometimes 3D pens—for tech publications including Gigaom, TechCrunch, and now Wirecutter. I understand the shortcomings of the technology as it exists, and also its potential.

When researching this guide, I interviewed Rachel Goldsmith, a New York–based artist who uses 3D pens prominently in her work (and who the 3D-pen brand 3Doodler commissioned to do artwork in the past) about the general features that matter the most when using a 3D pen. I also spoke to Joseph Flynt, who writes frequently about 3D pens for industry blog 3D Insider, about notable pens he has tested.

What is a 3D pen?

A 3D pen is the handheld cousin of a 3D printer. You feed strands of hard plastic (called filament) into the pen, and the pen melts the filament and extrudes it out of the tip as a string of gooey plastic. By holding the pen like a regular pen and drawing in any direction—including straight up into the air, with practice—you can create 3D art, figurines, game pieces, or basic plastic objects like baskets and phone holders. You may even be able to repair broken objects made from ABS plastic by using a 3D pen to “weld” the pieces back together with melted ABS.

3D pens can be useful to people of all ages and ability levels—even kids as young as 8 can use models specially designed to be safer to work with, like our also-great pick. They tend to appeal to anyone who already likes 3D printers, drawing, or modeling, though they offer less fine-grained control during the creative process than many artists may be used to: Drawing a clean-looking model with a 3D pen takes a lot of practice, which means that beginners should be okay with their creations looking a little more organic.

This freeform drawing aspect is also what makes 3D pens especially appealing to kids, though for those who prefer more guidance or structure, a wealth of stencils are available online for creating anything from the Golden Gate Bridge to a rhinoceros beetle. Manufacturers generally do not recommend 3D pens for children under 8, but we think use by a responsible younger child under adult supervision is fine.

If you already own a 3D printer, you might feel like you already have enough plastic objects in your life. But working with a 3D pen is more creative and satisfying because you’re actually producing something with your hands instead of designing with software and letting a printer produce it. You can also combine 3D printing with 3D drawing by using a 3D pen to fill in mistakes in a printed model, or to finish it with colorful details. And 3D pens don’t have a size limit like a 3D printer—you can work at virtually limitless scale.

How we picked

In early 2018, we tested eight pens that ranged in price, shape, and capabilities. In 2020 we found no new models worth testing. Photo: Signe Brewster

While searching for 3D pens to test, we consulted existing buying guides from sites like 3D Insider, Popular Science, and Code Mom. We also asked our experts about the most important features to look for and potential flaws to avoid.

You can spend up to $300 on a 3D pen, but not everyone needs the extra features found on high-end models, such as more-powerful motors (which allow for more precision and additional extrusion options) or the capability to print using unusual materials. You can also find pens for less than $25, but they get poor reviews, and we didn’t come across any worth testing. The best pens for most people tend to cost between $25 and $100 and have the following features:

  • Comfortable to hold: Because 3D drawing projects usually take significant time, comfort is important. Although one of our experts said it’s possible to get used to the shape of any 3D pen, we preferred a pen with a more ergonomic shape that’s comfortable from the start. And the heat from the part of the pen that melts plastic shouldn’t make the grip area uncomfortable to hold.
  • Reliable: The pen shouldn’t be prone to filament clogs or break easily.
  • Steady plastic extrusion: The pen should put out a steady, even strand of plastic at a comfortable speed, adding to your sense of control over the pen.
  • Customizable settings: Pens that give you a choice of extrusion speeds make it easier to switch between slower detail work and faster infill work, and multiple temperature settings make it possible to work with a wider range of filament types.
  • Continuous extrusion: A continuous-extrude option (where you simply press a button once to start drawing) is easier on your hand during longer drawing projects than a button you have to hold down.
  • Easy to load: Whether you want to load in a fresh string of plastic or swap the existing one for a different color, it should be simple and fast to load and unload filament.
  • Swappable tips: Pens that come with (or have the option to buy) multiple tip sizes allow you to draw in different thicknesses, which is useful for switching between details and filler.
  • Portable: The pen should be cordless or at least have a cord that’s long enough to use in a variety of work environments. In our experience, a cord of less than around 6 feet of length still felt a bit too short.
  • Good customer service: The company behind the pen should be reachable if something goes wrong. It’s a bonus if the pen has a generous replacement policy or warranty.
  • Widely compatible filament: Most 3D pens are compatible with lots of different brands of filament, but some require uniquely designed plastic that has special features—or locks you into buying from the same company. A 3D pen that can work with a range of materials and brands is better.
  • Safe: The pen shouldn’t give off dangerous or overly smelly fumes.

Using the above criteria, we narrowed our list to eight 3D pens for an initial round of testing in early 2018: the 3Doodler Start, 3Doodler Create, Scribbler 3D Pen (discontinued), Mynt3d Printing Pen, Soyan 3D Pen (discontinued), Polaroid Draw (discontinued), 3Dsimo Basic, and Tipeye Smart 3D Pen (discontinued). In late 2018, we tested the 3Doodler Create+ and 3Doodler Pro (discontinued). In late 2020, we tested the 3Doodler Pro+.

How we tested

Photo: Signe Brewster

I tested all 11 pens myself and then enlisted the help of a panel of four kids, ages 8 to 10, to further test the two pens appropriate for people under 12. For the initial test, we evaluated how comfortably each pen fit into testers’ hands and took note of whether it felt too hot after extended use. We drew a straight line across a sheet of plastic, constructed a small box that required drawing straight into the air, and built a 10-inch-tall model of the Eiffel Tower using a paper stencil.

We also evaluated the settings on each pen, including how easy it was to change the temperature and speed. We loaded and unloaded filament and watched out for jams. We also made note of how much smell and noise were produced.

For our kid test panel, we asked each child to use each of the two pens for up to 30 minutes apiece. We provided the kids with books of stencils but let them decide how they wanted to play with the pens. Some kids used the stencils, others chose to free draw. We then asked the kids to pick their favorite pen and explain what they liked and disliked about each.

The best 3D pen: 3Doodler Create+

Photo: Rozette Rago
Our pick

3Doodler Create+

Comfortable to hold and easy to start using right away, the Create+ also benefits from 3Doodler’s excellent customer service and the option to buy different-size tips.

The 3Doodler Create+ offers the best overall drawing experience for people ages 12 and older who want to start working with 3D pens. In our testing, it drew clean lines of plastic that solidified quickly, was the easiest to use, and was one of the most comfortable to hold. It comes with the widest variety of useful accessories, and should you ever need assistance, 3Doodler’s customer service is by far the most responsive we encountered.

3D drawing projects can take a while to complete, so we like that the triangular coated aluminum body of the Create+ feels natural to hold, even over long periods of use. Your finger rests naturally within reach of two buttons that you press once to start or stop extruding at a slow or fast speed, respectively—a design we found ideal for achieving fine control while drawing. The Create+ also stays comfortably cool while drawing, unlike many of the earliest 3D pens.

The Create+ puts out steady, even strands of plastic as you draw. The lines solidify quickly and stay put when you draw over them; most other pens grab onto still-soft filament and drag it along, warping your drawing. We appreciate that instead of having to hold a button down to extrude the plastic, you just press once, which adds to this pen’s comfort for long periods of drawing. The Create+ has a speed range that’s somewhere in the middle of the pack for pens we tried, but both its fast and slow settings are comfortable for normal drawing. The pen is also the best among those we tested at drawing lines straight into the air—something we didn’t do all that often during normal use, but that’s a much-hyped ability for 3D pens.

Loading filament is easy with the Create+; it follows the standard 3D pen procedure, which is similar to that of a glue gun. To unload filament, you press and hold both extrude buttons until the strand of filament is loose enough to tug out. 3Doodler recommends unloading the pen after every use to prevent long-term damage from storing plastic inside it. The pen lets you choose between two heat settings, for ABS plastic (about 380 degrees Fahrenheit) or PLA plastic (about 360 degrees), which is all you need if you’re using 3Doodler’s line of filament options (more on this below).

While making an Eiffel Tower sculpture during testing, we found the 3Doodler Create+ provided the best overall drawing experience. Photo: Signe Brewster

Supposedly, one of the most common problems with any 3D pen is a filament clog (caused by melted plastic hardening and getting stuck inside the pen), and 3Doodler pens are the only ones we tested that come with tools designed to fix clogs. However, we never had the opportunity to use it because the Create+ pen—like all 11 pens we tested—never actually clogged for us.

The Create+ is among the only pens we tested with the option to buy additional tip sizes (you can buy them for the 3Doodler Create and Pro pens too). One of our experts strongly recommends extra tips, as thin tips give you more control over detail work, and thick tips are better for filling in large areas more quickly. After testing the various tips, we agree. If you want more control over detail work or to speed up infilling, the additional tips will help. There are also two ribbon-like shapes that can be useful for adding texture. You don’t have to buy these tips for a good experience with the Create+, but they certainly help. One word of caution: Make sure the pen is hot when you swap a tip or you risk permanently breaking your pen.

As a part of our testing, we sent each 3D pen company an email asking if it is safe to use third-party filament. We found that 3Doodler responded within minutes—the fastest of any company we queried—and was one of only a handful of companies that responded at all. After shipping it halfway across the country twice, the original Create pen we tested stopped working and we had the chance to interact with 3Doodler’s customer service again. As before, someone responded within minutes by email. Within 25 minutes of the first response, the person helping us had diagnosed an electrical issue and offered to send a replacement. All 3Doodler pens are covered by a one-year warranty.

Flaws but not dealbreakers

The 3Doodler Create+ is easy to hold and use, but it uses expensive filament. Photo: Signe Brewster

We got similar line control from the Tipeye Smart 3D Pen, our former budget pick, despite the Create+ costing significantly more. However, we found that the Create+ model’s other strengths make the additional cost worthwhile. We also noticed that the Create+ has a tendency to pause to reheat when you stop extruding, which can be annoying when you are stopping and starting frequently to draw fine details. It slowed down the overall pace of our drawing, but it was worth the wait to get evenly heated filament in return.

The Create+ comes with 75 10-inch strands of plastic, which is more than you get with most of the pens we tested. However, the ABS and PLA filament refills for the Create+ pen—which come in a wide range of colors and types—are the most expensive of any pen we tested. (The company says that using third-party filament voids the pen’s warranty, as 3Doodler’s pen motors are designed to handle straight, short strands of plastic, not the longer, coiled strands common to inexpensive third-party filament. ) For example, a pack of 25 10-inch strands (20 feet of filament) for the Create+ starts at $8, compared with 240 feet of third-party filament for our budget pick for around $15—which works out to about $1.25 for 20 feet. That’s a fivefold difference, but considering that 20 feet is enough filament for roughly two hours of constant drawing at the Create+ pen’s fast speed, it’s not a huge difference on a per-project basis. (The Eiffel Tower in the photo above took about an hour, including starting and stopping.)

Third-party filament refills are much less expensive than 3Doodler’s proprietary filament strands. Photo: Rozette Rago

The shorter filament strands of 3Doodler pens also run out faster, which means you have to stop and reload a Create+ more often than you do pens from other manufacturers. Reloading while drawing can be annoying—especially if you wait too long to reload and the pen just stops extruding plastic.

As was the case with all of the other pens we tried, using the Create+ with ABS filament gives off a chemical-like odor, while PLA filament strands smell more like maple syrup. Also like other models, the Create+ produces a whiny motor noise while drawing. It’s annoying but not loud enough to bug someone in the next room.

The Create+ has a 5.9-foot cord that’s fairly standard for a 3D pen, but it felt a bit short in our work environment: You want a lot of slack in the cord so you don’t feel any tugging from the top of the pen as you work. We recommend buying an extension cord if you don’t plan to use the pen directly in front of an outlet.

The best pen for kids under 12: 3Doodler Start

Photo: Signe Brewster
Also great

3Doodler Start

Though slow and lacking in features compared with traditional 3D pens, the Start is cool to the touch, making it safer for kids younger than 12.

After testing two kid-safe pens with the help of a panel made up of four children, we think the 3Doodler Start is the best option for anyone under age 12. We noticed during testing that kids like to touch and mold the pens’ extruded plastic, which means that pens with hot tips that use ABS or PLA plastic—including the Create+—are not safe for them to use. The 3Doodler Start has a cool-to-the-touch tip and makes use of special plastic that comes out of the pen at a cooler temperature so kids can draw and mold however they choose.

Our four-kid panel was split on which pen they preferred overall, but all four kids liked using the Start, and only two liked the 3Dsimo Basic. The Start is smaller and curved, which a majority of the kids said made it fit better in their hands; the Basic is longer and flat like a candy bar. Neither pen clogged during testing, but because their tips are shorter than an adult-friendly pen, the part of the pen around the tip had a habit of dragging through half-dry plastic and getting gunked up. Both pens got gunky enough to annoy the panelists, though the Start gunked noticeably less than the Basic.

The 3Doodler Start is small enough to fit in a child’s hands—and won’t burn them. Photo: Signe Brewster

It’s possible to draw steady, straight lines with the Start, but because it uses filament that has a more claylike texture and takes longer to dry than the filament in our other picks, it requires more patience while using. In fact, it’s the slowest pen of any we tested because you have to move slowly and wait for lines to dry completely before attempting to draw over them again.

Some of the testers found drawing with the 3Dsimo Basic to be slightly easier because the pen uses PCL plastic—a material that performs closer to the PLA used in the adult pens. We also found that drawing a line straight into the air was much harder with either of the kid-friendly models, because it takes the just-extruded plastic from these pens so long to dry. Neither model has temperature controls.

We didn’t encounter any problems loading or unloading the Start, but as with our top pick, you’re stuck using 3Doodler’s expensive refill filament. And one tester disliked the short, straight pieces of filament (which need to be reloaded more often than other types) so much that he preferred the 3Dsimo Basic overall.

You cannot buy other sizes of tips for the Start. However, you can charge it and use it without a cord—a feature we wish all 3D pens had. And like the Create+, the Start benefits from the fastest-responding customer service team of any pen we tested. The Start is also backed by a one-year warranty. It produced virtually no odor and was quiet enough not to annoy patrons in a coffee shop during our kid test panel.

The competition

The 3Doodler Pro+ is the most comfortable pen to hold and gave us the greatest amount of control over our lines. It’s one of the most flexible pens we’ve tested when it comes to materials, too: While the Create+ is compatible with PLA, ABS, and Flexy plastics, the Pro+ adds additional options like wood (blended with plastic), copper (also blended with plastic), and nylon. It also allows for precise temperature control, which makes it easier to work with unusual third-party materials. However, these benefits weren’t enough for us to recommend the Pro+, because it costs more than three times as much as the Create+. That pricing rules it out for anyone but the most devoted 3D pen users.

The 3Doodler Create is the older model of the Create+ and was our previous top pick. We like it for many of the same reasons as the later model, including comfort, customer service, and tips for drawing multiple line sizes. Its brushed aluminum exterior also looks a bit more polished than the Create+ model’s plastic shell, in our opinion. However, the Create+ handles filament noticeably better, making drawing smooth, straight lines easier. If you want a pen that shares most features with our top pick at a cheaper price, the Create could be a good option while it’s still available.

The Mynt3d Printing Pen the company loaned us was dead on arrival—it would load filament only a few millimeters at a time and heated up only when we held one of its buttons down, which is not the way it’s designed to work. But the squarish shape of the pen would have been enough to disqualify it for comfort reasons: Unlike with the other pens, our fingers did not rest naturally on the extruder button. Mynt3d did not respond to our customer service request.

We tested the cool-to-the-touch 3Dsimo Basic against the 3Doodler Start to find the best 3D pen for kids. 3Dsimo is one of the few companies (along with 3Doodler) that responded to our customer service request, and the pen is compatible with cheaper, third-party filament. Although three of the four kid testers thought the Start’s smaller size made it easier to hold in their smaller hands, one thought the Basic allowed them to draw in greater detail. In our own testing, we agreed: While the Start extrudes claylike plastic that is easier to mold, the 3Dsimo’s plastic feels closer to what’s used in adult pens (despite being cool to the touch immediately after extrusion). The Basic comes with a beautiful book of stencils that’s larger and better printed than the Start’s stencil booklet, but the pen is also more expensive and not as widely available as the Start.

The 3Doodler 3D Build and Play isn’t a traditional 3D pen; you turn a handle to extrude a string of soft plastic into a mold to create shapes. We tried it in person at Toy Fair in 2020 and found it underwhelming. While it’s safe to use for children ages 4 and up, we found it still took some skill to use the molds, and the results looked sloppy.

About your guide

Signe Brewster

Signe Brewster is an editor on Wirecutter's PC team. She also writes about virtual reality. She previously reported on emerging technology and science for publications like Wirecutter, MIT Technology Review, Wired, Science, and Symmetry Magazine. She spends her free time quilting and pursuing an MFA in creative writing.

Further reading

  • The Best Electronics Kits for Kids and Beginners

    by Signe Brewster

    We tested electronics kits with kids ages 7 to 12 and got feedback from parents and makers to find the most engaging ways for kids to learn about electronics.

  • The 29 Best Gifts for 5-Year-Olds

    by Kelly Glass, Caitlin Giddings, and Wirecutter Staff

    Many of the best gifts for 5-year-olds are projects or kits to help them explore their newly developing interests, whether they’re in art, music, science, or nature.

  • The 25 Best Gifts for 7-Year-Olds

    by Kelly Glass, Ellen Lee, and Wirecutter Staff

    Some of the best gifts for 7-year-olds foster a sense of accomplishment and challenge them to think strategically.

Wirecutter is the product recommendation service from The New York Times. Our journalists combine independent research with (occasionally) over-the-top testing to save people time, energy and money when making buying decisions. Whether it's finding great products or discovering helpful advice, we'll help you get it right (the first time).

  • About Wirecutter
  • Our team
  • Staff demographics
  • Jobs at Wirecutter
  • Contact us
  • How to pitch
  • Deals
  • Lists
  • Blog
  • Newsletters

Dismiss

Multi sensor compatible 3D-printed electrochemical cell for voltammetric drug screening

. 2021 Jul 18;1169:338568.

doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338568. Epub 2021 May 5.

Priscila Alves Ferreira  1 , Fabiano Mendonça de Oliveira  2 , Edmar Isaias de Melo  2 , Adriana Evaristo de Carvalho  3 , Bruno Gabriel Lucca  1 , Valdir Souza Ferreira  1 , Rodrigo Amorim Bezerra da Silva  4

Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Do Sul, 79074-460, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
  • 2 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38500-000, Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil.
  • 3 Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, 79804-970, Dourados, MS, Brazil.
  • 4 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38500-000, Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • PMID: 34088376
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338568

Priscila Alves Ferreira et al. Anal Chim Acta. .

. 2021 Jul 18;1169:338568.

doi: 10. 1016/j.aca.2021.338568. Epub 2021 May 5.

Authors

Priscila Alves Ferreira  1 , Fabiano Mendonça de Oliveira  2 , Edmar Isaias de Melo  2 , Adriana Evaristo de Carvalho  3 , Bruno Gabriel Lucca  1 , Valdir Souza Ferreira  1 , Rodrigo Amorim Bezerra da Silva  4

Affiliations

  • 1 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Do Sul, 79074-460, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
  • 2 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38500-000, Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil.
  • 3 Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, 79804-970, Dourados, MS, Brazil.
  • 4 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38500-000, Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • PMID: 34088376
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338568

Abstract

3D printing is a hot topic in electroanalytical chemistry, allowing the construction of custom cells and sensors at affordable prices. In this work, we describe a novel small and practical 3D-printed electrochemical cell. The cell's body, manufactured in ABS on a 3D printer, is composed by three parts easily screwed: solution vessel, stick and cover with two embedded 3D-pen-printed carbon black-polylactic acid (CB-PLA) electrodes (counter and pseudo-reference). The cell is compatible with any planar working electrode, in which boron-doped diamond, graphite sheet (GS) and 3D-printed CB-PLA were shown as examples. A new alternative protocol to quickly produce 3D-printed sensors using a 3D pen and other low-cost apparatus is also proposed. The voltammetric performance of each evaluated sensor was carried out in the presence of redox probe ferricyanide and paracetamol as model analyte, and the surfaces were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and scanning electrochemical microscopy. To present an analytical application of the 3D-printed cell, low-cost flexible sensors (GS and CB-PLA) were used as integrated platforms for sampling and detection of solid drugs. As a proof-of-concept, traces of drugs with a historic of counterfeit or adulteration (sildenafil citrate, tadalafil, losartan and 17α-ethinylestradiol) were abrasively sampled over the sensor and assembled on 3D-printed cell to perform a fast voltammetric scan in the presence of only 500 μL of electrolyte. This protocol is attractive for pharmaceutical and forensic sciences as a simple preliminary screening method which could identify the presence or absence of the suspicious drug as well as impurities or adulterants. The 3D-printed cell was also used for the determination of 17α-ethinylestradiol in a contraceptive pill to demonstrate a quantitative analysis. The cell is quickly printed (90 min), cheap (US$ 0.30) and requires low electrolyte volumes (0.5-3.0 mL), being suitable to be used in several other electroanalyses, especially for on-site applications.

Keywords: 3D-drawing-pen; Additive manufacturing printing technology; Carbon-based sensor; Drug screening; Electrochemical fingerprinting; Fused deposition modeling (FDM).

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

  • Exploring the coating of 3D-printed insulating substrates with conductive composites: a simple, cheap and versatile strategy to prepare customized high-performance electrochemical sensors.

    de Oliveira FM, Mendonça MZM, de Moraes NC, Petroni JM, Neves MM, de Melo EI, Lucca BG, Bezerra da Silva RA. de Oliveira FM, et al. Anal Methods. 2022 Sep 1;14(34):3345-3354. doi: 10.1039/d2ay00803c. Anal Methods. 2022. PMID: 35979860

  • 3D-printing pen versus desktop 3D-printers: Fabrication of carbon black/polylactic acid electrodes for single-drop detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene.

    Cardoso RM, Rocha DP, Rocha RG, Stefano JS, Silva RAB, Richter EM, Muñoz RAA. Cardoso RM, et al. Anal Chim Acta. 2020 Oct 2;1132:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Jul 30. Anal Chim Acta. 2020. PMID: 32980099

  • 3D printing for electroanalysis: From multiuse electrochemical cells to sensors.

    Cardoso RM, Mendonça DMH, Silva WP, Silva MNT, Nossol E, da Silva RAB, Richter EM, Muñoz RAA. Cardoso RM, et al. Anal Chim Acta. 2018 Nov 29;1033:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 9. Anal Chim Acta. 2018. PMID: 30172331

  • 3D-printed electrochemical platform with multi-purpose carbon black sensing electrodes.

    Silva-Neto HA, Dias AA, Coltro WKT. Silva-Neto HA, et al. Mikrochim Acta. 2022 May 28;189(6):235. doi: 10.1007/s00604-022-05323-4. Mikrochim Acta. 2022. PMID: 35633399 Free PMC article.

  • Complete Additively Manufactured (3D-Printed) Electrochemical Sensing Platform.

    Richter EM, Rocha DP, Cardoso RM, Keefe EM, Foster CW, Munoz RAA, Banks CE. Richter EM, et al. Anal Chem. 2019 Oct 15;91(20):12844-12851. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02573. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Anal Chem. 2019. PMID: 31535844

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Adjusting the Connection Length of Additively Manufactured Electrodes Changes the Electrochemical and Electroanalytical Performance.

    Crapnell RD, Garcia-Miranda Ferrari A, Whittingham MJ, Sigley E, Hurst NJ, Keefe EM, Banks CE. Crapnell RD, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 6;22(23):9521. doi: 10.3390/s22239521. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36502222 Free PMC article.

  • 3D-printed electrochemical pestle and mortar for identification of falsified pharmaceutical tablets.

    Shergill RS, Farlow A, Perez F, Patel BA. Shergill RS, et al. Mikrochim Acta. 2022 Feb 12;189(3):100. doi: 10.1007/s00604-022-05202-y. Mikrochim Acta. 2022. PMID: 35152330

  • Fully Integrated 3D-Printed Electronic Device for the On-Field Determination of Antipsychotic Drug Quetiapine.

    Ragazou K, Lougkovois R, Katseli V, Kokkinos C. Ragazou K, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;21(14):4753. doi: 10.3390/s21144753. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34300495 Free PMC article.

  • A 3D Printer Guide for the Development and Application of Electrochemical Cells and Devices.

    Silva AL, Salvador GMDS, Castro SVF, Carvalho NMF, Munoz RAA. Silva AL, et al. Front Chem. 2021 Jul 2;9:684256. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.684256. eCollection 2021. Front Chem. 2021. PMID: 34277568 Free PMC article. Review.

MeSH terms

Substances

3D-pen for 3D-printer, fixing bloatware / Habr

Almost everyone has heard about 3D-pens. Many have tried them, many have them. So, perhaps, this gadget will surprise no one. And, probably, if there is a 3D printer at home, then the pen against its background will look very funny. But... Do not rush, a 3D pen can become an indispensable assistant and a very handy tool for any maker. Now, using my example, I will show how easy it is to save a three-dimensional model that took 41 hours to print using a 3D pen. nine0003



Let's start by inspecting the gadget.

Everything is standard, the box contains instructions, power supply and the pen itself.

Power supply cable is 1.4 m long, should be enough for most outlets near tables.

12 volt, 3 amp power supply.

It easily gives out the declared volts at idle, I didn’t measure the current, sorry. Let's go straight to the test.

Handle like a handle. Of the interesting - this is the specified nozzle diameter - 0.7 mm. A big plus for me personally is that the pen is omnivorous. You can print both PLA and ABS. There is also a manual temperature control.

Mode selection is intuitive. You just need to press the buttons on the sides of the screen.

Next, press the feed button, you can release it once. Heating starts. Heats up quickly, faster than a 3D printer. nine0003

When the desired temperature is reached, the indicator to the left of the screen changes from red to green.

In addition to adjusting the temperature, there is an adjustment for plastic feed (speed) on the handle.

On the other side of the feed adjustment there are 2 buttons - “squeeze out” and “pull out”.

Filled for the first test with a piece of plastic left over from the last print.

On the first delivery, you can see that there was already some plastic in the nozzle. This is good, since the handle was really checked. Some printer manufacturers supply them with a printed figure on the table, the user immediately sees that the device is working and prints as it should. nine0003

I had test plastic right away for a reason, I refilled transparent SBS, it is quite soft and often there are problems with it when printing on a printer. Here, everything immediately went briskly.

A small digression.

I was given a set of plastic along with the pen.

3D palette.

By the way, a very good addition to the 3D pen. In addition to conveniently located plastic in separate pockets, there is a compartment for storing a pen, as well as an envelope with sketches on tracing paper for easy creation of three-dimensional models. nine0003

We take a tracing paper and draw glasses along the contour.

Once the plastic has cooled, it can be easily removed from the tracing paper. We're filming.

Draw the second bow.

Next, melt the temples to the glasses.

PLA plastic is very pleasant to work with, easy to soften and stick to each other. But there is one drawback, it should not be overheated, it becomes too fluid, but more on that later. nine0003

Glasses are ready.

Now let's get down to business. I printed a Pinky monster figurine from DOOM 3. Printing did not work right away, the model is very complex with spikes and other details sticking out in all directions. I printed both in 2 extruders with supports from HIPS, and with supports generated in MeshMixer. But when moving to the beginning of the hands, something always fell off and I had to stop printing. Perhaps the plastic is to blame, it is almost a year old and it was stored without a package and a box, just like that. nine0003

In general, for the third time I combined printing methods and added supports from HIPS plastic to the model with supports from MeshMixer. In the middle of printing, I saw that my hands were torn off again, but I spat and finished printing to the end, deciding to simply glue the damaged parts.

The parts have been reprinted and now with the help of a 3D pen I can easily glue them to the main model.

With such a seam, glued parts are obtained, but firmly. And the protruding excess plastic can be ground off or cut off with a knife after treatment with dichloromethane. nine0003

Saw off the muzzle.

And glue a new, high-quality one.

This is a darned creation of Frankenstein.

Here you can see the comparison of the quality of the old and new muzzle.

Let's move on to the hands. It’s more difficult here, in some places it turned out to be a big gap.

But, in principle, the handle easily copes with wide slots.

It remains only to process the seams.

I didn't sand or dry sharpen them. I decided to treat the entire model with methylene chloride, it dissolves both PLA and ABS equally well.

The seams have become smoother, but most importantly, the top layer of plastic has become soft and can be easily cut with a knife, like plasticine. Align all the seams, cutting off the excess, and once again go through the brush with DCM.

And here is the result:

Finally, let's look inside the 3D pen. nine0003

Remove the black tip and unscrew one single screw.

Here you can see a ceramic nozzle with a heater and a thermistor, a short bowden tube and an extruder on a simple brushed motor. The feed is controlled by the rotation speed of the motor shaft. On the motor there is a small brass gear pushing through plastic, on the other hand, all this is pressed by a small bearing with a flat side. In general, everything is very simple, like Kalash. Yes, and remember, I wrote about the fact that you should not overheat PLA plastic. In the disassembled photo, it is noticeable that there is something red on the back of the heater, where the tube enters it. It's just PLA plastic, I painted it a little in the heating mode for ABS, and it became so liquid that it went in the opposite direction. If this is abused, then I think a lot of it can accumulate there and this will lead to overheating and failure of the handle. Be careful. nine0003

In conclusion, I would like to say that earlier, when I didn't have a pen, I was angry… I'm sorry. :) Before, when I didn't have such a pen, I used a soldering iron to close the damaged seal. A soldering iron with temperature control helped a lot. But ... you understand - this is not the best tool for repair. You need to hold the soldering iron with one hand, feed the rod with the other, and hold the part itself with the third. Another option is to chemically dissolve the plastic and seal the gaps. But when the solution dries, it shrinks a lot and dips appear. Ideally, it turns out with a 3D pen. Among the shortcomings of the pen itself, I will note only 12 V power supply. Since now there are already 5 V pens and you can carry them with you, and power them from a USB battery, it is more convenient than sitting at the outlet. nine0003

To potential buyers

With a 10% discount, the Dali Plus 3D Pen and PLA Palette can be purchased with the promo code GT-3D.

Certificate for 3d pens - trts.info

Views: 796

04/14/2022 at 17:41

Various devices are used for 3D modeling. One of the advanced products of the new generation is the 3D pen. This is a tool for creativity, with the help of which three-dimensional figures are drawn with plastic from vegetable raw materials or petroleum products. Using the device, three-dimensional objects are created, as well as products printed using a 3D printer are corrected. nine0003

Before the release of 3D pens into circulation, entrepreneurs must register a declaration of conformity. The document confirms the safety of the product for the health of the consumer. It is prohibited by law to sell goods without permission. The violator will have to pay a fine. Also, the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation establishes a measure of administrative punishment in the form of confiscation of products and suspension of the enterprise.

Certificate for 3 d pens is obtained on a voluntary basis after registration of the declaration. This gives entrepreneurs the opportunity to increase the competitiveness of products, strengthen consumer confidence. nine0003

A declaration must be registered for 3D pens according to the following regulations:

  • TR TS 004/2011 - the document applies to low-voltage devices powered by an electrical network at a voltage of 75 - 1500 V;
  • TR TS 020/2011 - applies to devices capable of creating electromagnetic interference and the quality of which depends on the influence of electromagnetic interference generated by other devices;
  • TR EAEU 037/2016 - provides for the restriction of hazardous compounds in the manufacture of electrical products. nine0198

If the device package does not include an electric power supply, that is, the device is powered by batteries, declaration according to TR TS 004 is not carried out. Manufacturers/importers register the declaration only according to TR CU 020 and TR EAEU 037.

The procedure for conducting the assessment process

The procedure begins with the preparation of the applicant's documentary base, which includes:

  1. GOST or Technical conditions according to which the goods are manufactured. Technical specifications are developed by the manufacturer if there is no suitable GOST for the manufactured product or the production technology differs from that provided for by the standards. There is no current GOST for the declared products. nine0198
  2. Documents of the importer - agreement of an authorized person, supply contract, invoice, customs declaration.
  3. Test reports that are carried out in an independent laboratory or in the conditions of an accredited research center.
  4. Other documentation.

The entrepreneur chooses the appropriate declaration scheme:

  1. 1d, 2d - carried out on the basis of the applicant's evidence from an independent laboratory. Scheme 2d is intended for a batch or unit of goods, 1d - for mass production. nine0198
  2. 3d, 4d, 6d - the procedure is based on evidence obtained from an accredited laboratory. Scheme 3d is intended for serial production, 4d - for a batch or unit of goods, 6d - for mass-produced products, if there is a QMS ISO 9001 in production.

During testing, indicators such as:

  • protection against electric shock, isolation protection;
  • no non-electrical hazards; nine0198
  • no risk of fire during normal and emergency operation, in the event of high temperatures, radiation or electric arc discharges;
  • absence of physical, chemical, biological hazards;
  • resistance to mechanical and climatic influences;
  • electromagnetic compatibility, interference immunity;
  • absence of toxic substances and hazardous chemical compounds (mercury, lead, cadmium, arsenic, hexavalent chromium, etc.) in the product composition. nine0198

The results of all studies are reflected in the test reports. The positive opinion of the expert serves as the basis for registration of the permit document. The declaration is registered in the FSA register from a personal account on the Rosaccreditation website using an electronic signature.

Additional documentation for the drawing device

Voluntary certificate for 3D pens allows you to highlight the quality, distinctive properties of the product, compliance with the selected standard.


Learn more